tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33423553523057001452024-03-13T22:32:56.015-07:00-David Foley's Labor and Employment Law Blog.David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.comBlogger92125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-64378379018097102152022-08-12T15:35:00.000-07:002022-08-12T20:09:50.200-07:00List of Law Suits filed by Federal Employees regarding the "Vaccination" Mandate Executive Order<div><span style="font-family: times;">This page is mostly to keep track of the federal employee mandate cases. From what I can tell, no one is keeping a list of those cases and reporting on it is very infrequent. I also keep some track of the other sister mandates (1. Military , 2. Federal Contractor, 3. Federal Employees, 4. CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), 5. OSHA, 6. Head Start. I also have some honorable mentions at the bottom which don't involve any of the six sisters.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b>I. Federal Employee mandate cases</b></div></span></span></div><div><ol><li><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhCItpM3B3nclrawLr9JfIqDcgKxr2NbBbRHPRjKCJpBEjwkpzTSJRFaUUROCmVQ5W7kqtouaampPYdLeVtjRodzYDtzlS4grqEgFPmIGnIxr9B_gmMlMwqzXp8ELhukohTqY5LReuYYLRD4Yr9sDWOrkmAwqkJ-CGwrvpXBF2uMRRvRV1DPkfsPhBb=s600" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="600" data-original-width="477" height="248" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhCItpM3B3nclrawLr9JfIqDcgKxr2NbBbRHPRjKCJpBEjwkpzTSJRFaUUROCmVQ5W7kqtouaampPYdLeVtjRodzYDtzlS4grqEgFPmIGnIxr9B_gmMlMwqzXp8ELhukohTqY5LReuYYLRD4Yr9sDWOrkmAwqkJ-CGwrvpXBF2uMRRvRV1DPkfsPhBb=w197-h248" width="197" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Scylla, a Six-headed Beast</td></tr></tbody></table><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535993693/Complaint-Mark-Brnovich-v-Biden ">Brnovich v. Biden,</a> filed by Attorney General of Arizona, on 9-14, No. 21-1568 (D. Ariz.) ("Defendants’ imposition of vaccine mandates on U.S. citizens and lawfully employed aliens, but not on unauthorized aliens at the border or already present in the United States, constitutes discrimination on the basis of national origin and alienage in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.") See his 10-22 <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535996644/Brnovich-34-Main-TRO ">motion for TRO </a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540080529/Brnovich-v-Biden-Order-on-Preliminary-Show-temp">Order </a>granting leave to file amended complaint and new motion for preliminary injunction 11-10; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542225068/BRNOVICH-v-Biden-Amended-Complaint-Doc-70-Arizona-AG-Amended-Complaint-11-19">Amended Complaint</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542224656/BRNOVICH-v-Biden-Doc-72-Motion-for-Prelim-Injunction-AG-of-AZ">Motion for Preliminary Injunction 11-19</a>; </span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/534909847/Costin-et-al-v-Biden-Complaint-Mandate">GREGG COSTIN, et al. v. Biden</a> filed by Michael Yoder on 9-23 (D.C.), 1:21-cv-02484</span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span><a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/10/why-i-am-suing-federal-government-my.html">Foley v. Biden</a>, filed by David Foley and Daniel Flickinger on 9-29 (Northern District of Texas) 4:21-cv-01098-O, </span><span>See </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/533829008/Document-16-Biden-Response" style="background-color: white; color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant's Response</a><span style="background-color: white;">, the </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/533829283/Judge-s-Order-Denying-Preliminary-Injunction-and-Ordering-Plaintiff-Response" style="background-color: white; color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Judge's Order</a><span style="background-color: white;">, and Plaintiff's </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/533829594/Plaintiff-s-Response-to-Judge-s-Order-Document-20" style="background-color: white; color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Response</a><span style="background-color: white;"> to that Order, and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536001425/Document-21-Biden-Response-to-Motion-177114667355">Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion</a>; Plaintiff's <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/539241088/plaintiff-s-2nd-motion-to-amend-Foley-v-Biden">second motion to amend</a> and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/539241360/22-1-Plaintiff-s-draft-amended-complaint-Foley-v-Biden">draft amended complaint</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542225557/Doc-23-D-Motion-for-Extension-of-Time-Re-Answer-Complaint-Foley-v-Biden">Defendant's request for extension of time to file answer to original complaint in light of potential amendment 11-22</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542226094/Doc-24-Plaintiffs-Opposition-to-Defendants-Request-for-an-Extension-Foley-v-Biden">Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's request for extension 11-23</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542226390/Doc-25-Biden-Reply-Re-Extension-of-time-Foley-v-Biden">Defendant's Reply re extension of time 11-24</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/543604177/Doc-26-Order-Granting-Extension-to-answer-complaint-pending-motion-on-amendment-Foley-v-Biden">Order granting motion for extension in part 11-29</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/544508964/Biden-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Leave-to-Amend">Defendant's opposition to motion for leave to amend 12-3</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/544939700/Document-28-Plaintiff-Response-Biden-Oppo-Motion-for-Leave-to-Amend-12-6-Foley-v-Biden">Plaintiff's reply to Defendant's opposition 12-6-21</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545917372/29-Defendant-Notice-of-Supplemental-Authority-McCray-Combined-With-Attachment-29-1">Defendant's notice of supplemental authority (Order in McCray)</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/547071706/30-Plaintiff-s-Supplemental-Authority-Cochran-Foley-v-Biden">Plaintiff's Notice of supplemental authority (Cochran v. SEC)</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549272333/Foley-v-Biden-Doc-33-2nd-Defendant-Supplemental">Defendant's Second Notice of Supplemental Authority 12-23 ( Donovan v. Vance, No. 4:21-cv-5148-TOR, ECF
No. 58, at 10-14 (W.D. Wa. Dec. 17, 2021); AFGE Local 501 v. Biden,
No. 21-23828-CIV, ECF No. 33, at 13-18 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 22, 2021</a>); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549272560/34-Plaintiff-s-Second-Supplemental-Foley-v-Biden">Plaintiff's Second Notice of Supplemental Authority 12-23 (Texas v. Becerra, No. 2:21-
CV-229, (N.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 2021) and Florida v. Nelson, No. 8:21-cv-2524-SDM-TGW, (M.D.
Fla. Dec. 22, 2021)</a>); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/550860190/Doc-35-Plaintiff-Third-Supplement-Authority">Plaintiff's third notice of supplemental authority</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/554322466/36-Fourth-Supplemental-Notice-of-Authority-in-Light-of-F4MF-v-Biden-Injunction-1-21-22">Plaintiff's fourth notice of supplemental authority (in light of injunction in F4MF)</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/586798547/Document-38-Joint-Status-Report-foley-v-biden">Joint Status Report</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/586797768/Doc-39-Filed-08-12-22-Order-Staying-Case-in-Foley-v-Biden-Pending-Feds-for-Med-Freedom">Order staying case pending Feds for Medical Freedom Injunction resolution</a></span></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545921131/Complaint-in-Brass-v-Biden-10-15-21-d-Colo-03919713126">Brass v Biden, filed pro se, 1:21-cv-02778-MEH (D. Colo.)</a> October 15, 2021; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545921470/Brass-v-Biden-Documents-Foia-Request">copies of FOIA requests sent by Brass</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535109775/5-main-1-pdf">ALTSCHULD ET AL v. RAIMONDO et al </a> (D.C.) filed by the Federal Practice Group on 10-19, 1:2021cv02779, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540075815/ALTSCHULD-Defendant-Memorandum-in-Support-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction">Defendant Response to motion for preliminary injunction</a> ;<a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540076509/Altschuld-Exhibits-14-1-in-support-memorandum">exhibits</a>11-3; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540074052/ALTSCHULD-v-RAIMONDO-Order-Denying-Prelim-Injunction-Show-temp-23">Order denying preliminary injunction</a> 11-8</span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;">Rydie et al v. Biden et al <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536000530/Employee-A-v-Biden-Complaint-Document-1"><strike>Employee A v. Biden</strike></a>, filed by Jonathan Bolls on October 19, 2021 (Maryland) 8:2021cv02696, see <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536001051/Employee-a-Document-7-Motion-for-TRO">motion for TRO</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542480561/Defendants-Opposition-to-Plaintiffs-Motion-Rydie-v-Biden-821-Cv-02696">Biden response in opposition 11-12</a>; Plaintiff Reply; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542480979/Plaintiffs-Reply-to-Defendants-Opposition-to-Plaintiffs-Motion-Rydie-v-Biden-821-Cv-02696">Order Denying TRO 11-19</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="background-color: white;"><a href="https://www.yoderesq.com/bidenvaxlawsuit">Church v. Biden</a>, filed </span>filed by Michael Yoder on 10-24 (D.C.)1:21-cv-02815, as reported by <a href="https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/27/new-lawsuit-biden-task-force-schemes-to-deny-religious-exemptions-falsifies-medical-records/" style="background-color: white; color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Under Cover DC</a>; Plaintiffs’ application for a <a href="https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/29/church-v-biden-lawsuit-update-the-week-ends-with-hope/" rel="noopener" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2b63ff; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">temporary restraining order</a>;<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222;"> </span> <a href="https://uncoverdc.com/2021/11/03/church-v-biden-govt-says-no-ripe-claim-over-religious-exemptions/" rel="noopener" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #2b63ff; outline: 0px;" target="_blank">opposition from the Defendants</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/537254508/Church-v-Biden-Civil-Action-No-1-21-cv-2815-CKK ">Plaintiff's Response 11-3</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540078464/Church-v-Biden-Memorandum-Order-denying-preliminary-injunction">Memorandum Order denying preliminary injunction 11-8</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542485862/Smith-v-Biden-21-Cv-19457-Complaint-and-Attachments-10-29-21">Smith v Biden, 1:21-cv-19457-CPO-SAK</a> filed 10-29 (NJ); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542492885/Brief-in-Support-Motion-for-Injunction-and-Exhibits-Smith-v-Biden-121-Cv-19457-CPO-SAK-Document-4-Filed-11-03-21">brief in support motion for injunction with exhibits</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542493373/Opposition-Motion-for-Injunction-Smith-v-Biden-121-Cv-19457-CPO-SAK-Filed-11-05-21">opposition to motion for injunction 11-5</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542494684/Reply-to-Opposition-Motion-for-Injunction-Smith-v-Biden-121-Cv-19457-CPO-SAK-Filed-11-06-21">Reply to motion in opposition 11-6</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542491098/Smith-v-Biden-21-Cv-19457-Opinion-Doc-19-11-8-21">Order denying injunction 11-8</a>; </span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540552615/Amended-Complaint-Afge-Local-501-Show-temp">AFGE Local 501 et al v. Biden</a> et al filed by Mark Berkowitz on behalf of AFGE Local 501 and Council of Prison Locals CPL 33 on 10-30 (Southern Florida)</span> 1:21-cv-23828-JAL<span>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540553381/Motion-Prelim-Injunction-Afge-Local-501">Motion for Preliminary Injunction</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540553722/Doc-20-CM-ECF-order-denying-motion-preliminary-injunction">Order denying preliminary injunction</a> (11-15) </span></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;">McCray v. Biden filed on 11-1-21; <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2021cv02882/237066/11/">Order denying motion for TRO dismissing complaint without prejudice</a> (12-7) </span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span><span style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #020202; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-size-adjust: 100%; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ECF-No.-1-Rodden-v.-Faucie-Complaint.pdf">James Joseph Rodden, et al. v. Dr. Anthony Fauci, et al</a>. filed by John J. Vecchione, Jenin Younes, and Harriet Hageman of <a href="https://nclalegal.org/2021/11/ncla-tppf-file-class-action-suit-for-naturally-immune-fed-employees-against-covid-vaccine-mandate/ ">New Civil Liberties Alliance</a> and Robert Henneke of Texas Public Policy Foundation on November 5, 2021 (Southern District of Texas) 3:21-cv-00317; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542474758/Rodden-Defendant-Response-in-Oppo-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-23-Main">Defendant's response in opposition to motion for preliminary injunction</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542475359/Defendant-Exhibits-to-Response-in-Oppo-to-motion-for-prelim-injunction-Rodden-v-Biden-23-1-8">exhibits</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542477983/Rodden-Reply-27-Main-and-Exhibit">Plaintiff's reply and exhibit</a>; </span></span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/544508528/Rodden-v-Fauci-Order-Denying-Preliminary-Injunction-11-27-21" style="background-color: white;">Order denying injunction 11-27-21</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://silentmajorityfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/1-Complaint.pdf">Donovan v. Vance, 4:21-cv-05148 (E.D. Wash.)</a>, filed by Nathan Arnold and Simon Peter Serrano for the Silent Majority Foundation on 11-15 (one federal employee, others contractors)</span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="color: #020202;"><span style="background-color: white;"><a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/01-main_Redacted.pdf">Payne v. Biden</a>, filed by Reed Rubinstein for America First Legal Foundation on November 22, 2021 (D.C.) </span></span> 1:21-cv-03077; <a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/4-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf">Plaintiff's motion for Summary Judgment (Nov 24)</a>; <a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/4-3-Memorandum-in-Support-of-MSJ-3.pdf">Memo in support of motion for summary judgment</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549271859/Payne-v-Biden-Motion-to-Stay-Answer-to-MSJ-Pending-Motion-to-Dismiss-doc-10">Defendant's motion for extension to answer MSJ</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549272019/Payne-v-Biden-Plaintiff-Response-to-Oppo-to-Stay-Doc-11-12-22-21">Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion 12-23</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545924749/MacGregor-Bjerken-v-Federal-Notice-of-Removal-Doc-1-921-Cv-00142">MacGregor & Bjerken v. Federal Agency Heads</a>, 21-cv-142 (D. Mont.) filed on 11-17, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545925270/Brief-in-Support-Ot-Tro-MacGregor-Bjerken-v-Federal-Notice-of-Removal-921-Cv-00142">Brief in support of TRO,</a> filed by Chris Gallus and Abby Moscatel <a href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mtd-9_21-cv-00142/pdf/USCOURTS-mtd-9_21-cv-00142-0.pdf">Order voluntarily dismissing case 11-29</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"> <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542164619/Complaint-Prison-Locals-33-and-2018-v-Vaccine-Mandate">AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COUNCIL OF PRISON LOCALS 33 and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL 2018 v. DIRECTOR KIRAN AHUJA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and LLOYD AUSTIN</a>, filed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr.
Michael T. van der Veen on behalf of Council 33 and Local 2018 on November 23, 2021 (E.D. Pa) 2:2021cv05172</span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/548699722/Feds-for-Medical-Freedom-v-Biden">Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden et al</a>., filed by TRENT MCCOTTER, JONATHAN BERRY, MICHAEL BUSCHBACHER of BOYDEN GRAY & ASSOCIATES December 21, 2021 (S.D. Tx) 3:21-cv-00356, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/548947634/Feds-for-Medical-Freedom-v-Biden-Motion-for-Injunction-With-Exhibits-1-of-2">motion for injunction part 1</a>, part 2, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/550297067/10-Order-Granting-Schedule-Feds-for-Medical-Freedom">Order accepting Plaintiff's proposed briefing schedule</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/552332737/Defendant-Response-F4MF-v-Biden-21">Defendants' Response in oppo to injunction</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/552333147/23-Plaintiffs-Reply-F4MF-v-Biden">Plaintiffs' reply</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553513287/Supplement-in-light-of-SCOTUS-decision-Feds-for-Medical-Freedom-Et-Al-v-Biden-Jr-Et-Al-Txsdce-21-00356-0029-0">Plaintiff's supplement in light of Supreme Court in OSHA and CMS</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553448854/Corrected-22-1945-Fed-v-Biden-1-13-22">Transcript of hearing</a> (1-13-22); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/554353057/Defendant-s-Response-to-29-notice-of-supplemental-F4MF-v-Biden-1-18-21">Defendant's Response to supplemental authority</a> (1-18-22); <span style="background-color: #fcff01;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/554301960/Injunction-F4MF-v-Biden-3-21-cv-356-Judge-Brown-Galveston-Tx-1-21-22">Nationwide Injunction</a> </span>(1-21-22); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/554353408/37-Notice-of-Appeal-injunction-F4MF-v-Biden">Notice of appeal </a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/1-Complaint-Final.pdf">VIERBUCHEN v. BIDEN</a>, Case 0:22-cv-00001-NDF, filed 01/04/22 (Wyoming) by John Knepper and Andrew Block for America First Legal </span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553634953/Doe-v-Austin-Complaint#download&from_embed">Doe v. Austin (Feds for Medical Freedom)</a> filed 1-14-21(M.D. Fla) by Nick Whitney, Carol A. Thompson, John J. Michaels of Federal Practice Group See covereage: </span><a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/federal-employee-group-broadens-legal-case-against-biden-vaccine-mandate" style="font-family: times;">https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/federal-employee-group-broadens-legal-case-against-biden-vaccine-mandate </a></li></ol></div><div><b><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></b></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b>II. Military only (</b>August 24, 2021 Department of Defense Mandate)</span></div><div><ol><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540555471/Amended-Complaint-Robert-v-Austin">Robert v. Austin</a>, filed by Todd S. Callender and Dale Saran on 8-17 (Colorado) 1:2021cv02228, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540556467/Motion-Prelim-Injunction-Roberts">Motion for preliminary injunction</a> 11-2, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540557043/Motion-Prelim-Injunction-Roberts-Exhibit-17">Exhibit 17</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540557191/Motion-Prelim-Injunction-Roberts-Exhibits-18">Exhibit 18</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535998625/Doe-v-Austin-Corrected-Complaint">Doe v. Austin</a>, filed by Ibrahim Reyes, Brandon Johnson, and Travis Miller (Defending the Republic) on 10-6 (N.D. Fla.) 3:21-cv-01211-AW-HTC (Military only, no federal employees), see <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535999422/Doe-v-Austin-Doc-30-Defendants-Motion-in-Response">Defendant Response</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535999603/Doe-v-Austin-Doc-31-Defendants-Motion-in-Response-and-Support"> Memo of Defendant Response</a>, and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535999740/Doe-v-Austin-Doc-33-Plaintiffs-Reply">Plaintiff's Reply</a> and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535999876/Doe-v-Austin-Doc-43-Plaintiffs-Reply">other Reply</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/539978347/Military-Mandate-TRO-Denial-Florida-Doe-v-Austin" style="background-color: white;">Order denying Preliminary Injunction</a> (<span style="background-color: #04ff00;">But also finding that service members can't be required to take BioNTech</span>)</span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://lc.org/newsroom/details/101521-military-federal-employees-and-civilian-contractors-sue-biden-1">Navy Seal, et al v. Biden</a> filed by <a href="https://lc.org">Liberty Counsel</a> on 10-15 (Middle District of<span> </span>Florida)<span> </span>8:21-cv-02429; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542231529/Navy-Seal-1-v-Biden-Order-821-Cv-02429-SDM-TGW-11-22">Order denying prelim injunction, deferring judgment in part (military only), and ordering information about exemption requests provided on schedule </a>(<span style="background-color: #04ff00;">finding that accommodations process might be guise as plaintiff suggest</span> - military only); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545917772/Navy-Seal-1-v-Biden-Middle-FL-Defendant-Oppo-to-Motion-for-Class-12-3-21-and-attachments">Defendant's opposition to class action with attached affidavits of military involved in the <strike>denial </strike>accommodation process 12-3</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/538487936/US-Navy-Seals-Et-Al-v-Biden-Austin">Navy Seals 1-26 et al v Biden and Austin et al</a>, filed First Liberty associated attorneys Kelly J. Shackelford, Jeffrey C. Mateer, Hiram S. Sasser, III, David J. Hacker, Michael D. Berry, Justin Butterfield
Texas, Roger Byron, Heather Gebelin Hacker, Andrew B. Stephens, and Jordan E. Pratt on November 9, 2021 (Northern District of Texas) 4:21-cv-01236-O; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542437115/Navy-Seal-Fort-Worth-America-First-Legal-Foundation-Amicus-Brief-421-Cv-01236-O-Document-12">Amicus America First Legal Foundation</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542436309/Navy-Seal-Fort-Worth-Doc-415-21-Cv-01236-O-Document-15-motion-for-preliminary-injunctionFiled-11-24-21">motion for preliminary injunction 11-24</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542436563/Navy-Seal-Fort-Worth-Doc-415-21-Cv-01236-O-Document-16-Motion-in-Support-Filed-11-24-21">brief in support motion injunction 11-24</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542436836/Navy-Seal-Fort-Worth-Doc-415-21-Cv-01236-O-Order-denying-motion-for-lack-of-notice-providing-further-information11-24-21">order denying motion for lack of notice to counsel (none filed NOA yet) and providing further instruction 11-24</a> ; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549273407/12-10-Defendant-Response-to-Prelimin-Injunction-Navy-Seal-Fort-Worth">12-10 defendant's response to motion for injunction</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549273541/12-17-Plaintiff-s-Reply-Re-Injunction-Navy-Seals-Fort-Worth">12-17 Plaintiff's reply</a> <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549272870/12-23-Navy-Seals-Mandate-Denial-Transportation-for-Medical-Care">supplemental evidence 12-23</a> (complaint of commander re ruse process); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/549273257/12-24-Navy-Seal-denied-travel-authorization-for-treatment">supplemental evidence 12-24</a> (denial of travel authorization for medical treatment); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/550829412/Navy-Seal-Order-O-Connor" style="background-color: #fcff01;">1-3-22 Order Enjoining</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="background-color: white; text-align: -webkit-center;"><span>?1:21-cv-03053-UNA</span></span><span style="background-color: white; text-align: -webkit-center;"> FRETZ v. BIDEN et al, filed 11-17-21 (info not available at this time)</span></span></li><li><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; text-align: -webkit-center;"><a href="https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/global/images/Abbott%20v%20Biden%20-%20Complaint.pdf">Abbott v. Biden,</a> Case 6:22-cv-00003 Filed 01/04/22 (National Guard)</span></li><li><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; text-align: -webkit-center;"><a href="https://eadn-wc01-1479010.nxedge.io/cdn/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-1-6-1-Complaint.pdf">Airforce Officer v Austin</a>, Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES filed, 01/06/22 by Michael R. Hirsh and others with St. Thomas More Society, (M.D. Ga)</span></li></ol></div><div style="text-align: -webkit-center;"><span style="font-family: times;">***See also this <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/554335268/Air-Force-Memo-from-Area-Defense-Counsel-re-Grant-the-Exemption-1-19-22" style="background-color: #04ff00;">excellent memo </a>from an Area Defense Counsel 1-19-22***</span></div><div style="text-align: -webkit-center;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b>III. Federal Contractors only (</b>Executive Order 14042)</span></div><div><ol style="text-align: left;"><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/global/images/20211029_TX%20v%20Biden%20et%20al%20(file%20marked).pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=">State of Texas v. Bide</a>n, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on October 29, 2021 (Southern District of Texas) 3:21-cv-00309 </span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536087052/Board-of-Regents-Complaint-As-Filed">State of Georgia et al v. Biden</a>, filed by representative for States of Georgia, Alabama, Idaho,
Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, and West
Virginia (Southern Georgia) 1:21-tc-05000 </span></li><li><span style="font-family: times;"><span>Kentucky v Biden<span style="color: #2b00fe;"> </span></span><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21120202-order-in-kentucky-v-biden" style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #2b00fe;">Judge Tatenhove's order</span></a><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"> on 11-30, enjoining the federal contractor mandate in 3 states.</span></span></li><li><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times;"><a href="https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ECF-1_Complaint.pdf">VANDERSTELT v. Biden</a>, filed 1:22-cv-00005 ECF No. 1, filed 01/04/22 (W. Michigan) by Sheng Li, John J. Vecchione, and Jenin Younes for New Civil Liberties Alliance (NECLA)</span></li></ol></div><div><b><span style="font-family: times;">IV. CMS</span></b></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b> </b><i style="background-color: white;"><a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MTAG/2021/11/30/file_attachments/2008888/Nationwide%20Injunction%20-%20CMS%20mandate.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: black;">Louisiana v. Becerra</span></a> </i><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"><span><i>https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/a-good-question-raised-by-us-district.html (dec <span> </span>1)</i></span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/press-releases/cms-injunction.pdf?sfvrsn=ed822d9d_2" style="background-color: white; text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #ac991f;"> </span><i><span style="color: black;">Missouri v. Biden</span></i><span style="color: #ac991f;"> Judge Schelp's order</span></a><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"> on 11-29, enjoining the federal healthcare worker mandate in 10 states. </span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: white;"><table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" class="table table-bordered" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); color: #333333; font-family: "Source Sans Pro", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px; max-width: 100%; width: 793px;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;"><tr style="box-sizing: border-box;"><td style="border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.42857; padding: 8px; text-align: center; vertical-align: top;">1/13/22</td><td style="border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.42857; padding: 8px; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; white-space: nowrap;">21A240</td><td style="border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.42857; padding: 8px; vertical-align: top;"><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a240_d18e.pdf" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #428bca; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank" title="The Court grants the applications to stay the two injunctions barring the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ regulation requiring facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid to ensure that their employees are vaccinated against COVID–19.">Biden v. Missouri</a></td></tr></tbody></table></span></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"><span style="font-family: times;"><i><br /></i></span></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"><span style="font-family: times;"><b>V. OSHA</b></span></span></div><table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" class="table table-bordered" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0px; border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); color: #333333; font-family: "Source Sans Pro", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px; max-width: 100%; width: 793px;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;"><tr style="box-sizing: border-box;"><td style="border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.42857; padding: 8px; text-align: center; vertical-align: top;">1/13/22</td><td style="border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.42857; padding: 8px; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; white-space: nowrap;">21A244</td><td style="border: 1px solid rgb(221, 221, 221); box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 1.42857; padding: 8px; vertical-align: top;"><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #428bca; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank" title="The Court grants the applications to stay the Occupational Safety & Health Administration’s challenged rule mandating that employers with at least 100 employees require covered workers to receive a COVID–19 vaccine.">NFIB v. OSHA</a></td></tr></tbody></table><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"><span><b><span> </span></b></span></span><a href="https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf" style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: black;">BTS Holding v. OSHA on 11-12</span></a></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b>VI. Head Start</b></span></div><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>December 31, 2021, <a href="https://www.everythinglubbock.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/35/2021/12/texasLISDvsXavierBecerraOrderTempRestrain.pdf">Memorandum Opinion and Orde</a>r issued by U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix in <i>Texas v. Becerra</i>, Case
No. 5:21-cv-00300-H, Doc. 42 (N.D. Tex) </li><li>January 1, 2022, <a href=" https://www.alabamaag.gov/Documents/news/Head%20Start%20Mandate%20Stay%20Order.pdf ">Memorandum Order</a> issued
by Judge Terry Doughty in<i> Louisiana v. Becerra</i> 3:21-cv-04370-TAD-KDM (Doc. 15) </li></ul></div><div><br /></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;">----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span></div><div><b><span style="font-family: times;">Honorable Mentions</span></b></div><div><b><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></b></div><div><u><span style="font-family: times;">On the issue of the time and forum to challenge the constitutionality of laws and orders when there exists an administrative scheme</span></u></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><i><span> </span>Cochran v. Security and Exchange Commissio</i>n, No. 19-10396 (5th Cir.,
December 13, 2021) </span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>In <i>Cochran</i>, the court recognized that a rule set forth in <i>Elgin v. Department of Treasury</i>, 567
U.S. <span> </span><span> </span>1 (2012), which acts to preclude certain plaintiffs from seeking redress in federal district
court in <span> </span><span> </span><span> </span>favor of administrative adjudication, “cannot be absolute.” Cochran at 20. <span> </span><span> </span><span> </span> <span> <span> </span></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span></span> https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Cochran-En-Banc-Opinion.pdf <a href="https://nclalegal.org/cochran-v-sec/">Cochran v. SEC - New Civil Liberties Alliance (nclalegal.org)</a></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><u><span style="font-family: times;">On the issue of the efficacy of the injections</span></u></div> <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjB56ntxYX1AhWYRzABHfeVBSIQFnoECAIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcasetext.com%2Fcase%2Fhalgren-v-city-of-naperville&usg=AOvVaw2ILTxnScRmRtiIrSx7a0Vo"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></a><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjB56ntxYX1AhWYRzABHfeVBSIQFnoECAIQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcasetext.com%2Fcase%2Fhalgren-v-city-of-naperville&usg=AOvVaw2ILTxnScRmRtiIrSx7a0Vo"><span style="font-family: times;">Halgren v. City of Naperville, 21-cv-05039</span></a></blockquote><div><u><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></u></div><blockquote><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.25in; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: times; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Contrary to Defendants’ claim, the nature of the disease and
vaccines involved in Jacobson (and thus the legitimate government interest
furthered by the legislation) present sharp factual distinctions from the
current case. Unlike COVID-19, which presents an infection fatality rate range
of ostensibly 0.0-1.63 percent, the smallpox pandemic killed tens of millions
with an infection fatality rate of 30 percent, exceeding the death toll of
World War I and II combined, and leaving even its survivors permanently
scarred, blind or disabled. Likewise, the <i>Jacobson</i> pandemic involved
higher transmissibility “attack rates” (i.e. the rate of contraction among the
at-risk populations), and unlike the vaccines for COVID-19 (which are designed
to mitigate symptomatic infection in the person vaccinated), the available
vaccine in Jacobson was, in fact, a sterilizing vaccine that affirmatively
killed the virus and prevented transmission within the community at large. <span style="background-color: #04ff00;">Factually,
this case isn’t <i>Jacobson</i>.</span></span></p></div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span> "</span><span> </span><span>most current evidence …confirms no proven
differential in the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2<span> </span>virus based upon vaccination
status for those infected"</span></span></p></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times;"> “court examined the record evidence on the issue presented and finds that Plaintiffs…made a preliminary showing that that natural immunity equals the material benefits of vaccine-induced protection alone.” </span></blockquote></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;"> </span></p><div><span style="font-family: times;"><u>On the travel mandate (masks not vaccines)</u></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><i>Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc</i>.<i> et al v. Biden et al</i>, <a href="https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/iqquerymenu.pl?391798">8:2021cv01693</a> (M.D. FL) filed July 12, 2021 by Brant Hadaway and George Wentz, Jr.; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553512937/Amended-Complaint-and-Attachments-Health-Freedom-Defense-Fund-Inc-Et-Al-v-Biden-Et-Al">Amended Complaint</a> (filed 12-13-21); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553512071/Answer-to-Amended-Complaint-Health-Freedom-Defense-Fund-Inc-et-al-v-Biden-et-al">Answer to Amended Complaint</a> (1-6-21)<div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-23797683347080021302022-02-02T19:21:00.000-08:002022-09-15T19:26:46.494-07:00Pre-emptive strikes<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjRdSYM98aOD9mGMHNdwafrm_XcbR45VzcP-DUdd15GzvUjv2dllI4sm2g7cmUh7ry4SxO1temPYW3b4W6yWUDJGbbCRtRip-ON8iHw4hupnskYmi4isubER1y8EUZ-zQcHqQz0W7qMybfaQXCsewqvYRRjJsqnjcVwL0hoR43zVzRtRgosg4JIcj3K=s1021" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1021" data-original-width="467" height="1106" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjRdSYM98aOD9mGMHNdwafrm_XcbR45VzcP-DUdd15GzvUjv2dllI4sm2g7cmUh7ry4SxO1temPYW3b4W6yWUDJGbbCRtRip-ON8iHw4hupnskYmi4isubER1y8EUZ-zQcHqQz0W7qMybfaQXCsewqvYRRjJsqnjcVwL0hoR43zVzRtRgosg4JIcj3K=w504-h1106" width="504" /></a></div><br />David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-84521021693130426442022-01-21T15:53:00.004-08:002022-01-21T15:53:48.889-08:00Numerous Federal Officials Enjoined from Enforcing Federal Employee Vaccine MandateThe tireless efforts of the good people at <a href=" https://feds4medfreedom.org/news-and-media/">Feds for Medical Freedom</a> have paid off with a huge win today in securing an injunction. As we know, these fights are never over until they are over, and we can expect more ups and downs, but this was a big day. <div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-uPiM3lIjGbQ/YetHAFKbDAI/AAAAAAAAAag/twgXM6v4xjECV7Cn4LSluw1C0qRkOttrwCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="306" data-original-width="1536" height="64" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-uPiM3lIjGbQ/YetHAFKbDAI/AAAAAAAAAag/twgXM6v4xjECV7Cn4LSluw1C0qRkOttrwCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" width="320" /></a></div><br /> The order and filings are linked here:<div><div><br /></div><div><span style="color: black;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/548699722/Feds-for-Medical-Freedom-v-Biden" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden et al</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">., filed by TRENT MCCOTTER, JONATHAN BERRY, MICHAEL BUSCHBACHER of BOYDEN GRAY & ASSOCIATES December 21, 2021 (S.D. Tx) 3:21-cv-00356,</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/548947634/Feds-for-Medical-Freedom-v-Biden-Motion-for-Injunction-With-Exhibits-1-of-2" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">motion for injunction part 1</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">, part 2,</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/550297067/10-Order-Granting-Schedule-Feds-for-Medical-Freedom" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">Order accepting Plaintiff's proposed briefing schedule</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">;</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/552332737/Defendant-Response-F4MF-v-Biden-21" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendants' Response in oppo to injunction</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">;</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/552333147/23-Plaintiffs-Reply-F4MF-v-Biden" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">Plaintiffs' reply</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">;</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553513287/Supplement-in-light-of-SCOTUS-decision-Feds-for-Medical-Freedom-Et-Al-v-Biden-Jr-Et-Al-Txsdce-21-00356-0029-0" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">Plaintiff's supplement in light of Supreme Court in OSHA and CMS</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">; </span><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/553448854/Corrected-22-1945-Fed-v-Biden-1-13-22" style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px; text-decoration-line: none;">Transcript of hearing</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> (1-13-22);</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"> </span><span style="background-color: #fcff01; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/554301960/Injunction-F4MF-v-Biden-3-21-cv-356-Judge-Brown-Galveston-Tx-1-21-22" style="text-decoration-line: none;">Nationwide Injunction</a> </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: times; font-size: 13.2px;">(1-21-22)</span></span><div><div><br /></div><div><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--></div></div></div></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-19863392354527468722022-01-17T09:44:00.002-08:002022-01-17T09:49:42.492-08:00March for Life on January 21, Rally for Freedom on January 23
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div>This could be a huge year for the Pro-Life movement. I cannot make it, but my prayers will be with those <a href="https://marchforlife.org">marching on January 21</a>.</div><div><br /></div><div>A <a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/massive-defeat-mandates-rally-planned-jan-23-washington-dc-speakers-include-rfk-jr-dr-malone-dr-mccullogh-lara-logan-steve-kirsch-etc/">massive rally is being held two days later in protest of the injection mandates</a>. Feds for Medical Freedom will be there and some of the strongest voices in the freedom movement will be there, including RFK Jr., Dr. Malone, and Dr. McCullough. Again, I wish I could be there, but my prayers will be with the rally attendees. </div><div><br /></div><div> The Joe that Americans voted for promised not to impose mandates. We seem to ended up with a different Joe. We can't be silent about it. I encourage anyone who can go to go, and those who cannot go to support them.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEikKckKaobY0Qxyo-ukYqJo9rZksaMzH4BepsOo4j004iTfidLQu7H6HagDsCqQuCGQuajPjcX3KmwWdi-whrIYnbSjLeneMqpMleAEVeHTqcMclDbqLoeimjaC7kqbRLhBDDgj8n1QrDBh6bxCdbWE-KNl8osixBf5HTFXLVdwR-6FoKWxDGeXnuMi=s1280" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1280" data-original-width="1129" height="477" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEikKckKaobY0Qxyo-ukYqJo9rZksaMzH4BepsOo4j004iTfidLQu7H6HagDsCqQuCGQuajPjcX3KmwWdi-whrIYnbSjLeneMqpMleAEVeHTqcMclDbqLoeimjaC7kqbRLhBDDgj8n1QrDBh6bxCdbWE-KNl8osixBf5HTFXLVdwR-6FoKWxDGeXnuMi=w421-h477" width="421" /></a></div><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-59423357014482866272022-01-12T20:43:00.009-08:002022-01-12T21:48:56.879-08:00Sudden Deaths in Tarrant County UpdateIn previous posts, I asked if <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/is-anyone-keeping-track.html">anyone was even trying to keep track of vaccine deaths</a> and I noted the <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/why-are-sudden-deaths-due-to-natural.html">rise in "sudden deaths"</a> that seems to have marked 2021. To be clear, I don't know why there has been a rise in sudden deaths. <div><br /></div><div>Covid-19 has disrupted many aspects of American life. Between lockdowns, telework, life under a mask, and life under fear, Americans are more unhealthy than ever. Americans are exercising less and socializing (in real life) less at the same time that they are drinking more, using more drugs, murdering each other more, and dying in car accidents more. Perhaps all of these factors have something to do with the rise in sudden deaths. </div><div><br /></div><div>If it hadn't been for Covid-19 and Covid-19 "vaccines" my chief culprits for the rise in sudden death would probably have been energy drinks (it seems like at some point in recent years we saw an odd anything-goes approach to their regulation and a dramatic rise in their consumption), vaping (could be fine, but it is fairly new), or illegal drugs. </div><div><br /></div><div>But, when the majority of the entire population has been injected with a new technology, that technology should be considered suspect #1 for evaluating any medical trends that follow.</div><div><br /></div><div>To rule out suspect #1, I looked at data from the Medical Examiner's office and identified thirteen decedents (out of about 1300) whose deaths seemed most likely to have been the result of the "vaccinations" (based on listed cause of death, age and date of death). I asked the Medical Examiner's office for records of their "vaccinations". The Medical Examiner's office explained that it did not have such records and so I requested their autopsy reports.</div><div><br /></div><div>So far I have received nine autopsy reports. Only one includes vaccine status. That case involved a 30-year old man whose medical history included asthma. According to the Medical Examiner, he was "vaccinated" but the Medical Examiner has no information as to when he was vaccinated or by what product. Prior to his death, he experienced extreme coughing, vomiting, and diarrhea. He tested negative for Covid-19. He had no history of drug or alcohol problems. He died in late August, 2021. The cause of death is listed as "Sudden Death with a history of asthma."</div><div><br /></div><div>I would feel a lot more comfortable with what is happening if someone could tell me the "vaccine" that he took, its batch number, and the date(s) that he took it. I would feel even more comfortable if they had already looked into this issue before I asked about it.</div><div><br /></div><div>I have similar concerns about the others whose autopsy reports I reviewed, I just don't know whether they received a "vaccine" (although the odds are that at least 5 of them had).</div><div><br /></div><div>The best way to assure those of us who are "vaccine hesitant" would be to provide us with all of the data so that we could reassure ourselves. </div><div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-15394615660687440692022-01-09T12:43:00.002-08:002022-01-09T12:43:36.925-08:00Who to read (Covid Injection and related)<div>I intend to add some more and will update this page, but here is a start:</div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Jeff Childer's Coffee & Covid <a href="https://substack.com/profile/45832042-jeff-childers">https://substack.com/profile/45832042-jeff-childers </a></li><ul><li>Florida attorney who has great insight and stays on top of the developments</li></ul><li>Steve Kirsch <a href="https://stevekirsch.substack.com/">https://stevekirsch.substack.com/ </a></li><ul><li>Silicon Valley guy who has brings together a lot of information and provides excellent analysis</li></ul><li>Robert F. Kennedy Jr <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org">https://childrenshealthdefense.org</a></li><ul><li>His book is a prerequisite for understanding what is happening </li></ul></ul><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-2219768282180381832022-01-04T20:02:00.004-08:002022-01-04T20:03:51.293-08:00The Six Sister Federal MandatesBetween August and November 2021, President Biden and his agents enacted six sister federal
injection mandates. <div><br /><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div style="text-align: left;">The first sister, the Military Mandate (issued by the Secretary of Defense on
August 24, 2021) was partially <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/550829412/Navy-Seal-Order-O-Connor">enjoined yesterday by U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor on January 3, 2022</a>. </div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"> The second sister, the Federal
Contractor Mandate (Executive Order 14042, issued on September 9, 2021) was enjoined–
nationwide–on December 7, 2021, by U.S. District J<a href="https://www.crowell.com/files/Georgia-Decision.pdf">udge R. Stan Baker in Georgia v. Biden, Case 1:21-tc-05000, (Doc. 94)</a></p></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="background-color: #fcff01;">The third sister, the Federal Employee Mandate (Executive Order 14043, issued
on September 9, 2021) has not yet been enjoined. </span></p></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">The fourth sister, the CMS Mandate (issued by
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on November 5, 2021) was enjoined by both </p></blockquote></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">U.S. District <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiLl4X52pn1AhUdl4kEHcnhB3AQFnoECAYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcasetext.com%2Fcase%2Fmissouri-v-biden-1&usg=AOvVaw0OTBcX4bNSsT_6qWhIYJsC">Judge Matthew Schelp on November 29, 2021 in Missouri v. Biden, Case No. 4:21-cv-01329-MTS (Doc. 28)</a></p></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">and </p></blockquote></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">Judge Terry Doughty on <a href="https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/attorneygeneral/documents/foi/vaccines/cms-injunction.pdf">November 30, 2021 in Louisiana v. Becerra, Case No. 3:21-cv-03970-TAD-KDM (Doc. 28)</a>–upheld by the Fifth Circuit in Louisiana v. Becerra, 20 F.4th
260 (5th Cir. 2021). </p></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><p style="text-align: left;">The fifth sister, the OSHA Mandate (issued by the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration on November 5, 2021) was enjoined by the Fifth Circuit on November 12,
2021, in <a href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca5-21-60845/pdf/USCOURTS-ca5-21-60845-0.pdf">BST Holdings v. OSHA, No. 21-60845</a>. The injunction was later lifted by a Sixth Circuit panel and is currently before the Supreme Court.</p></div></blockquote><div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">The sixth sister, the Head Start Mandate, was enjoined on</p></blockquote></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">December 31,
2021, by<a href="https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txndce/5:2021cv00300/356875/42"> Judge James Wesley Hendrix in Texas v. Becerra, Case No. 5:21-cv-00300-H (Doc. 42)</a>
and by</p></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;">Judge Terry Doughty on January 1, 2022 in <a href="https://www.alabamaag.gov/Documents/news/Head%20Start%20Mandate%20Stay%20Order.pdf">Louisiana v. Becerra 3:21-cv-04370-TAD-KDM (Doc. 15)</a></p></blockquote></div></blockquote><p>What can you do to help? Pray and keep praying for all who face these injection mandates, especially federal employees. </p><div><div><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-11557325383424524822021-12-27T22:50:00.010-08:002021-12-29T20:15:07.375-08:00Why are Sudden Deaths due to "Natural Causes" or "Etiology Unexplained" up in 4 Texas Counties? (Tarrant-Johnson-Denton-Parker)<div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>The Tarrant <a href="https://mepublic.tarrantcounty.com">Medical Examiner</a> classifies sudden deaths into a variety of sudden death categories. Most are recorded as something like "sudden death with a history of [specified] disease." <div><br /></div><div>But the Medical Examiner also has several generic sudden death categories, which I have grouped together. These are variations of "sudden death due to natural causes" or "sudden death etiology undetermined". Focusing on these unspecified sudden deaths in adults, I put together a chart which shows that 2021 has seen a significant rise in such deaths.<div><br /></div><div>In fact, there were more sudden, unexplained, natural deaths from June to September of this year, than there were total in any previous year. Now, what was happening during those months...</div><div><br /></div><div>No such deaths have yet been reported for October-December, 2021, but there are still 409 deaths which have not yet been given a determination, most of them falling in those months. </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-zmtnkv2V_4c/YcqxC00Ho_I/AAAAAAAAAY4/7C15vXHvEncpYn4PwV8KyatbM1lmaQsIgCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="601" data-original-width="857" height="367" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-zmtnkv2V_4c/YcqxC00Ho_I/AAAAAAAAAY4/7C15vXHvEncpYn4PwV8KyatbM1lmaQsIgCNcBGAsYHQ/w525-h367/image.png" width="525" /></a></div><br /><br /></div>Age, date of death and description here<br /><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-3Prw1rRQPzM/YcqvxukMJMI/AAAAAAAAAYw/k-v-aRjDxK0DivwwmtYFzTinwXVMjk1MQCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="941" data-original-width="534" height="640" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-3Prw1rRQPzM/YcqvxukMJMI/AAAAAAAAAYw/k-v-aRjDxK0DivwwmtYFzTinwXVMjk1MQCNcBGAsYHQ/w450-h640/image.png" width="450" /></a></div><br /><br />I honestly hope that there is a reasonable explanation for this which is due to an increased number of residents or a change in policy or personnel or something. But I also have no faith that anyone is really tracking the effects of the large-scale medical experiment that has been taking place.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">I am not jumping to conclusions, I just want an explanation and assurances that the "vaccination" records of the dead are being tracked.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><b>Edit</b>: On a social media post that has since been "moderated" into oblivion, someone asked where I got this data. I got it from the link below. I downloaded each year going back to 2011. I sorted for "sudden deaths" and looked for those that had no explanation. This is a different category than "unknown causes" because this death category includes the signifier "sudden." I have </span><a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/is-anyone-keeping-track.html" style="text-align: left;">previously posted</a><span style="text-align: left;"> about an Open Records Request where I am trying to satisfy my curiosity and quell my concerns. I </span><a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/searches-for-died-suddenly-at-all-time.html" style="text-align: left;">posted as well</a><span style="text-align: left;"> about the rise in searches for "sudden death" and others have also noticed this. I don't claim to have answers. I just want to know. And if a bunch of us are just conspiracy theorists, I think that the best way to bring us back into the fold would be to provide information and stop ending discussions. Just throw us a bone and give us the data so that we can go chase some other conspiracy.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">It is no conspiracy theory however that the Pharmaceutical-Medical-Government-Media-Military establishment trained for such occasions as this and during their training, they decided that they should shut us up, drown us out, and discredit us. See for example <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf%20(jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com)" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;"><span style="color: #2b00fe;">The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028, a Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators</span></a>. </div></div></div><div><br /></div><br /></div></div></div><div><div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b>Also:</b> I am happy to share the full spreadsheet that I put together with anyone who wants it. I am just not posting it here because it has people's names in it. You can leave a comment if you want to see it or email me at david.foley.JMJ@protonmail.com.</div></div></div></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b>Following up</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b><br /></b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">In this graph, I used all adult or adolescent "sudden" categories. The results here are not as dramatic as the sudden unexplained results above. So far, 2021 does not have more overall "sudden" deaths than 2020. But, again, there over 400 pending cases, so we don't know what the final result will be. The last "sudden" death recorded was in September and that is about where the backlog of "pending" cases begins. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">In a rude projection, I matched a projected column which ends in September 2021 to the September 2020 column. If the numbers hold (they could be more, they could be less) to what happened last year, we would be adding another 18 cases. If that is what happens, 2021 will indeed have shown a significant increase in overall sudden deaths in addition to very significant increase in sudden-unexplained deaths. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div>Far left column is projected (56) next is so-far 2021 (38), next is 2020 (49) etc</div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-raQus1pR-so/YcvwEt9m_YI/AAAAAAAAAZQ/3xRPRAGg0WMPxPEIwx5YwXpSO4a977NNACNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="21" data-original-width="946" height="34" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-raQus1pR-so/YcvwEt9m_YI/AAAAAAAAAZQ/3xRPRAGg0WMPxPEIwx5YwXpSO4a977NNACNcBGAsYHQ/w648-h34/image.png" width="648" /></a></div><br /><br /></div><div><!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style"></div><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script><!--AddThis Button END--><div><br /></div></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Y-j-wq-TMhA/Ycvu-_Y4JaI/AAAAAAAAAZI/uSdga5HAe2cx27Xf11ZP1pkuBemJinEfQCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="2261" data-original-width="1010" height="778" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Y-j-wq-TMhA/Ycvu-_Y4JaI/AAAAAAAAAZI/uSdga5HAe2cx27Xf11ZP1pkuBemJinEfQCNcBGAsYHQ/w706-h778/image.png" width="706" /></a></div><br /><b>12-29</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Another note is that there were ten-year highs for all-category sudden deaths in three months in 2021: March, June, and July.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">For years 2021-2011, the numbers recorded in March were</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span> 9-0-6-4-5-4-3-6-5-1-2</span><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span>For the month of June in those years</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span><span> 8-6-1-5-5-1-2-4-1-2-2</span><br /></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span><span>For the month of July in those years</span></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span><span><span> 6-3-1-4-3-4-1-4-5-4-1</span><br /></span></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What do those numbers mean? It is hard to say. Were injection rates high in March, June, and July? I think so, but I am not sure. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Perhaps these numbers are too small to think much of and perhaps this is just statistical noise. But, there are still 4 cases pending for March, 3 cases pending for June, 8 cases pending for July, 28 for August, 36 for September, 67 for October, 120 for November, and 115 for December. When all of those pending cases are categorized, my guess is that there will be no argument about whether 2021 was a bellwether year in sudden deaths. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The only question will be why. I hope someone asks. And I hope they aren't afraid to ask if it has something to do with the injections that have been incessantly pushed.</div><br /><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-43925299787635787542021-12-26T19:29:00.002-08:002022-09-15T19:20:22.986-07:00Federal Employee Fired for Injection Refusal Just before ChristmasIn my post <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">Staying true to its Arbitrary Roots, Federal Employee Mandate takes December Off, mostly</a>, (Nov-29), I mentioned that the SFWTF was cryptic when it caveated its guidance to agencies about waiting until January to start firing people. The SFWTF wrote,<br /><br /><div><blockquote>“We understand that your agencies m<b>ay need to act on enforcement sooner for a limited number of employees</b>, such as where there are additional or compounding performance or workplace safety issues under consideration, but in general, consistency across government in further enforcement of the vaccine requirement after the start of the new calendar year is desired,” they added.</blockquote>I observed, that it sounded like they were talking about probationary employees but don't want to say it. </div><div><br /></div><div>At least one probationary federal employee just before she would have gained the rights of a permanent employee and two weeks before Christmas.</div><p style="background-color: white; color: #121212; font-family: "Open Sans"; font-size: 16px; margin: 26px 0px;">Michaela Coughlin was a civilian operations research analyst at Eglin Airforce Base. She took a principled stand was fired on December 17, 2021. She describes her reasons:</p><p style="background-color: white; margin: 26px 0px;"></p><blockquote style="color: #121212; font-family: "Open Sans"; font-size: 16px;">"So my whole argument here is obviously I have my own personal reasons but it stands to that we have a personal choice to do this," Coughlin said. "This is tyranny at play here so especially being a federal employee under the office of office were held to a higher standard. And we can’t go breaking the constitution here whether or not I would’ve had the vaccine wouldn’t of change things for me because we all have a right to choose."</blockquote><p><span style="color: #121212; font-family: Open Sans;"><a href="https://weartv.com/news/local/unfair-labor-practice-complaint-filed-against-eglin-air-force-base-over-vaccine-mandate">https://weartv.com/news/local/unfair-labor-practice-complaint-filed-against-eglin-air-force-base-over-vaccine-mandate</a></span></p><p><span style="color: #121212; font-family: Open Sans;">Well said and good luck.</span></p><p style="color: #121212; font-family: "Open Sans"; font-size: 16px;"><br /></p><p style="color: #121212; font-family: "Open Sans"; font-size: 16px;"> </p><p></p>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-32729392236781416672021-12-24T19:17:00.006-08:002021-12-25T17:37:32.137-08:00Definition of "Fully Vaccinated" depends on what they can get away with, simple as that<!--AddThis Button BEGIN-->
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;">Press Secretary Psaki <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2021/12/20/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-jen-psaki-december-20-2021/">on 12-20-21</a>/;</span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0a2458; line-height: 28.16px; margin: 0px auto 25px; max-width: calc(50% - 20px); padding: 0px; width: 615px;"><span style="font-family: times;">Q:..Is there going to be any sort of update to those requirements that will include further guidance on, you know, whether boosters will be included as like a — as a requirement towards being fully vaccinated, essentially?</span></p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0a2458; line-height: 28.16px; margin: 0px auto 25px; max-width: calc(50% - 20px); padding: 0px; width: 615px;"><span style="font-family: times;">MS. PSAKI: Sure, it’s a good question. So, we would — first, the CDC has not changed their evaluation of what being “fully vaccinated” means. I think Dr. Fauci has said it’s not a matter of “if” but “when.” And then, obviously, we base any of our policies from the federal government on the CDC guidance.</span></p><div><span style="font-family: times;">Dr. Fauci <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/fauci-not-matter-of-if-but-when-booster.html">said on 12-09-21</a> that the decision to change the definition of "fully vaccinated" was dependent on the status of cases in the courts.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><span> </span><br /></span></div><div><blockquote><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="background-color: white;"> "Well, </span><span style="background-color: white;">timing of that matters, Kate, with regard to the lawsuits"</span></span></blockquote></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;">The goal is to get more shots into more American arms as fast as possible. The only thing slowing them down is the courts. Once they get the green light to mandate the first installment of the subscription service, they will mandate its continuance. At some point, they will likely roll the flu shot into it as well. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;">By the way, it is not acceptable for a President to use his powers over the workplace as a means to change the behavior of citizens. That is not what those powers are for. We don't have a king or an emperor. But the Administration <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/12/the-plan-is-pretty-clear.html">has admitted </a>that is what it is doing as part of its plan to get "the unvaccinated vaccinated."</span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><blockquote><div><span style="background-color: white; color: #0a2458;"><span style="font-family: times;">The President’s plan will reduce the number of unvaccinated Americans by using regulatory powers and other actions to substantially increase the number of Americans covered by vaccination requirements—these requirements will become dominant in the workplace</span></span></div></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: times;">When the President is not only requiring the military service members and the employees that he directly controls to be injected or leave, but also attempting to make it so they cannot work anywhere without the only jab, how can anyone say that he is not coercing people to take an EUA product?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: times;"> </span></p><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-31875572065191633472021-12-16T21:07:00.005-08:002021-12-19T22:17:31.374-08:00Cobwebs, Small Flies, and Big Lies, some things never change<div><i>Laws </i>like to <i>Cobwebs c</i>atch small Flies</div>Great ones break thro' before your eyes<!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div><br /></div><div><span> -Poor Richard's Almanac </span><br /></div><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>See also</span></div><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TTvddr1HWzQ/YbwX4mx-eXI/AAAAAAAAAWo/2cwRJTtQAEMNWBV4wXIbXVaN391QoLF6ACNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="161" data-original-width="312" height="288" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TTvddr1HWzQ/YbwX4mx-eXI/AAAAAAAAAWo/2cwRJTtQAEMNWBV4wXIbXVaN391QoLF6ACNcBGAsYHQ/w559-h288/image.png" width="559" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Yj6VsROwqlU/YbwasmZ9HGI/AAAAAAAAAW0/wpcJBOkAW5k1VwY4IhtPA1ngiczhsQ0pQCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="163" data-original-width="310" height="168" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Yj6VsROwqlU/YbwasmZ9HGI/AAAAAAAAAW0/wpcJBOkAW5k1VwY4IhtPA1ngiczhsQ0pQCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" width="320" /></a><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: right;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--kn7h5UTnlI/YbwamUSdAxI/AAAAAAAAAWw/JVkPKRhEA1Yp5W0Wgmqtj_PUJZrgt2sgwCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="183" data-original-width="275" height="206" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--kn7h5UTnlI/YbwamUSdAxI/AAAAAAAAAWw/JVkPKRhEA1Yp5W0Wgmqtj_PUJZrgt2sgwCNcBGAsYHQ/w310-h206/image.png" width="310" /></a></div></div><br /><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /><br /></div></span></div><div><span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div></span></div><div><span><br /><br /></span></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-88059482915504685382021-12-15T22:02:00.000-08:002021-12-15T22:02:38.298-08:00The Plan is Pretty ClearIf it doesn't make a lot of sense to you that the President has required teleworking employees to receive injections to keep their coworkers safe, that's probably because the goal of the mandate has less to do with the safety of the workforce than it does to move the needle on the number of Americans (i.e. citizens) who are "vaccinated."<!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div><br /></div><div>Just look at the the White House website. He is bluntly using every tool at his disposal to make American citizens get vaccinated. His Safer Federal Workforce Task Force and agency heads barely even try to come up with reasons to justify a policy that has no nooks or crannies except for those "as required by law." But why should they? </div><div><br /></div><div>He has already telegraphed that this is just part of the plan to get <i>Americans</i> vaccinated. Of course, the problem with this is that the President is not supposed to use the pretense of workplace safety in order to commandeer the bodies of his workforce to achieve his goals that are unrelated to workplace safety.</div><div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-e9E1e3Z3W34/YbrSj9OZAQI/AAAAAAAAAWg/Eu2bssyrrbY5bS-hploo9MGTqTcavXxOQCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="209" data-original-width="685" height="198" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-e9E1e3Z3W34/YbrSj9OZAQI/AAAAAAAAAWg/Eu2bssyrrbY5bS-hploo9MGTqTcavXxOQCNcBGAsYHQ/w646-h198/image.png" width="646" /></a></div><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/covidplan/#vaccinate">https://www.whitehouse.gov/covidplan/#vaccinate</a></div><div><br /></div><div><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0a2458; font-family: MercurySSm-Book-Pro_Web, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.16px; margin: 0px auto 25px; max-width: calc(50% - 20px); padding: 0px; width: 610.5px;">The President announced vaccination requirements for the federal government in July and called on the private sector to do more to encourage vaccination as well. Since that time, employers, schools, nursing homes, restaurants, hospitals, and cities in all 50 states have announced new vaccination requirements. Since July, the share of job postings that require vaccination are up 90%. And we know these requirements work. At the beginning of August, when Tyson Foods announced its requirement—only 45% of its workforce had gotten a shot. Today, it stands at 72%, meaning half of Tyson’s unvaccinated workers have now gotten a shot—well ahead of the company’s November 1<sup style="box-sizing: border-box;">st</sup> deadline. After United Airlines announced its vaccination requirement, more than half of its unvaccinated employees went out and got vaccinated with weeks left to go before the deadline. In Washington State, the weekly vaccination rate jumped 34% after the Governor announced requirements for state workers.</p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0a2458; font-family: MercurySSm-Book-Pro_Web, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.16px; margin: 0px auto 25px; max-width: calc(50% - 20px); padding: 0px; width: 610.5px;">All told, these efforts—and countless other Administration initiatives and policies—have resulted in over 175 million fully vaccinated Americans. But there are still nearly 80 million Americans eligible to be vaccinated who have not yet gotten their first shot.</p><p style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0a2458; font-family: MercurySSm-Book-Pro_Web, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 28.16px; margin: 0px auto 25px; max-width: calc(50% - 20px); padding: 0px; width: 610.5px;">The President’s plan will reduce the number of unvaccinated Americans by using regulatory powers and other actions to substantially increase the number of Americans covered by vaccination requirements—these requirements will become dominant in the workplace. In addition, the plan will provide paid time off for vaccination for most workers in the country.</p></div><div><br /></div><div><br /><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-8484944011452892132021-12-15T20:36:00.000-08:002021-12-15T20:36:28.766-08:00Is anyone keeping track?Earlier tonight, I sent a request to my county's medical examiner for the vaccination dates (if any) for certain people whose causes of death are be publicly available. I cross-referenced them in VAERS to confirm they had not been reported there. I have no information as to the "vaccination" history of any of these people and could not glean anything from the internet other than that they died way too young.<div><br /></div><div>Given that several new, experimental medical products have recently been injected by more than half of the public, I would expect the medical examiner to have this information at his fingertips. </div><div><br /></div><div>If he does not have that information, that can only be because he is not looking for it when he assesses the cause of death. If he is not looking for it, is anyone?</div><div><br /></div><div>I would like nothing more than to find out that most of these people were not "vaccinated" and that if they were "vaccinated" they had not received any injections near the times of their deaths. Even though it is a small sample size/universe, I would find that somewhat comforting. On the other hand, I would be more concerned than I am now if I saw that all of them had been "vaccinated" within two weeks of their deaths.</div><div><br /></div><div>I will update this page with any information that I receive.</div><div><!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--zxbNgEo2wU/Ybq84xGz6GI/AAAAAAAAAWY/GrRGD9eHr04qZWJKMtX-M9suDCTcHFziQCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="201" data-original-width="968" height="232" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--zxbNgEo2wU/Ybq84xGz6GI/AAAAAAAAAWY/GrRGD9eHr04qZWJKMtX-M9suDCTcHFziQCNcBGAsYHQ/w645-h232/image.png" width="645" /></a></div><br /><br /></div><br /><br /></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-33859051833922775562021-12-14T21:30:00.004-08:002021-12-15T20:49:52.003-08:00Historic Defiance of an Order and Discharge of Members of the Armed ForcesEarlier this week, we learned that the Air Force had <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/12/14/air-force-members-discharged-covid-vaccine/6505305001/">terminated 27 airmen for defying the order </a>to take experimental injections. <div><br /></div><div>Whatever you think of the "vaccines", you should at least respect these airmen for following through on their moral convictions. I find it as pathetic as it is predictable that the relatively few press outlets who covered this story failed to acknowledge the moral courage of these men, but rather sought to diminish their importance by quoting only Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said "all of them were in their first term of enlistment, so they were younger, lower-ranking personnel." In other words, their life's dream was to serve in the Air Force and they had to give it up for the convictions not long after they joined. . <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhbabSygNt4RgcAsCrXsylBBw5BDDcmbO5EEGkg8CcPc1MpN0wkZ8RgJspOfhKgpoFnQP4O5SxxKeMplZDKmjgP48aYXJiAFKLeH_puGe1vm4YCO_xhLReKhyTMlhVqUJCz9CQG02rY03g1lCXq55ofoypx1buGKWiDjbOlkPewmHfdarbQnO38Y0Ik=s1140" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1140" data-original-width="1140" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhbabSygNt4RgcAsCrXsylBBw5BDDcmbO5EEGkg8CcPc1MpN0wkZ8RgJspOfhKgpoFnQP4O5SxxKeMplZDKmjgP48aYXJiAFKLeH_puGe1vm4YCO_xhLReKhyTMlhVqUJCz9CQG02rY03g1lCXq55ofoypx1buGKWiDjbOlkPewmHfdarbQnO38Y0Ik=s320" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The Hammer and Syringe Emblem</td></tr></tbody></table><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Even worse is the transparently dishonest characterization of this purge as normal by comparing these heroes to common order violators.</div><blockquote>It is not unusual for members of the military to be thrown out of the service for disobeying an order; discipline is a key tenet of the armed services. As a comparison, Stefanek said that in the first three quarters of 2021, about 1,800 airmen were discharged for failure to follow orders.</blockquote><div>Of those 1,800, how many involved a group of airmen being discharged for refusing to follow an order out of moral conviction? Comparing these courageous airmen to those who are discharged for common order violations strikes me as spiteful and inappropriate.</div><div><br /><div><div>In 1968, 43 soldiers from Fort Hood <a href="https://peaceandplanetnews.org/schnall-gi-resistance/">refused to be deployed to repress peace demonstrations at home</a>. </div><div><br /></div><div>I am no military history buff and I don't know if there have been other similar events. I think it is pretty safe to guess however, that we will soon be eclipsing the 43 order-refusers of 1968 in a mass defiance of orders event that will eventually lead to the largest discharge of soldiers in modern times.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-10282839669822306812021-12-08T23:05:00.002-08:002021-12-08T23:05:23.204-08:00Federal Vaccine Mandates: Three Iced, Two In Effect. Don't forget to pray for members of the Military and Federal Employees There has been a lot of great news about the blocking of three federal mandates (OSHA, CMS, and federal contractors). But, the orders requiring servicemembers and federal employees have not yet been blocked.<div><br /></div><div> Please pray for the members of the military and the federal civilian employees, and especially for the spiritual and physical health of those who took the injections because of the mandates.<div><!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--></div></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-38157969042806963322021-12-07T20:52:00.004-08:002022-01-17T09:27:30.405-08:00Whose "Community Standards"?A group of federal employees who reject the mandated injections recently had their thriving Facebook group disabled. According to Mr. Zuckerberg's Company, "Feds 4 Medical Freedom goes against our Community Standards on misinformation that could cause physical harm." Facebook claims that it encourages free expression, but doesn't allow false information about COVID-19 that could contribute to physical harm.<div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K6RVjBw_wOE/YbAmCJk7IiI/AAAAAAAAAVA/eMoMS0bmkAM0g3JZq5qe0sD8Cq39TKh9ACNcBGAsYHQ/s1732/Facebook%2BFeds%2B4%2BCommunity%2BStandards.jpeg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1732" data-original-width="1024" height="465" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K6RVjBw_wOE/YbAmCJk7IiI/AAAAAAAAAVA/eMoMS0bmkAM0g3JZq5qe0sD8Cq39TKh9ACNcBGAsYHQ/w275-h465/Facebook%2BFeds%2B4%2BCommunity%2BStandards.jpeg" width="275" /></a></div>So, you are free to talk on Zuckerberg's platform, just so long as what you say isn't false. That is, you are free to talk, as long as what you say agrees with Zuckerberg. You can get away with contradicting Zuckerbergian shibboleths until Zuckerberg's monitors notice that you are getting too many views, likes, reposts, and new members. At that point, you might be a danger to yourself and others.</div><div><br /></div><div>I would not have such a problem with that if Mr. Zuckerberg were more upfront about it. The terms and conditions should be clear: "You are not allowed to disagree with the orthodoxy and shibboleths of your betters on this platform." Instead, he claims that this is part of "our Community Standards."</div><div><br /></div><div>I have lived in various states and regions of America. I think that I understand the community standards of most American communities. Based on all of my experience, I don't recognize the Community Standard. It is foreign to me.</div><div><br /></div><div>American Community Standards involve accepting that a man has the right to open his mouth and be proved an idiot. American Community Standards involve the right to exclaim that the Emperor has no vaccine.</div><div><br /></div><div>The "Community Standards" of Mr. Zuckerberg's company is simply the standard of an insecure elite that knows it cannot compete in the free flow of ideas and information. </div><div><br /></div><div>Since we are now communicating over the Internet, Americans had better do something to make sure that their Internet communications are governed by American Community Standards. And we'd better do it fast. In 2017, you were probably not planning how you would find ways to speak freely about your opinions in the event of a health emergency, but at that time, Big Pharma was making plans to partner with Big Tech to muzzle you. </div><div><br /></div><div>If you want to understand what is happening, you need to read RFK's book and follow the citations for yourself. The prescience of the scenario from the 2017, <a href="spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf (jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com)">The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028, a Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators</a>, is unsettling. </div><blockquote><br /></blockquote><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GsHTyBQON-w/YbA0sSTgitI/AAAAAAAAAVI/KwB7c4dPSQovhyx2aIlOEhvlTgDyoW_-QCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="493" data-original-width="498" height="417" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GsHTyBQON-w/YbA0sSTgitI/AAAAAAAAAVI/KwB7c4dPSQovhyx2aIlOEhvlTgDyoW_-QCNcBGAsYHQ/w421-h417/image.png" width="421" /></a></div><br /><br /><p></p><p> </p><blockquote><div> </div></blockquote><div><br /><!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div><br /></div><br /><div><br /></div></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Fli_m8mWG8s/YbA2tqZotpI/AAAAAAAAAVQ/O8zkDcg9ZO0Cvd-7gXpTM35lA7PqBUE_wCNcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="474" data-original-width="512" height="416" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Fli_m8mWG8s/YbA2tqZotpI/AAAAAAAAAVQ/O8zkDcg9ZO0Cvd-7gXpTM35lA7PqBUE_wCNcBGAsYHQ/w449-h416/image.png" width="449" /></a></div><br />FOOD FOR THOUGHT: How might using social media partners to silence and deplatform critics ensure that Americans have access to information that is as free, safe, and effective as the vaccine?</div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-21263423232690834802021-12-01T18:35:00.006-08:002021-12-01T19:20:51.135-08:00A Good Question Raised by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty<div>U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty noted and asked in his order yesterday in <i><a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MTAG/2021/11/30/file_attachments/2008888/Nationwide%20Injunction%20-%20CMS%20mandate.pdf">Louisiana v. Becerra</a> </i>the following:</div><div><br /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;">The CMS Mandate does not yet require boosters to the COVID-19 vaccines. However,
the CDC recently recommended boosters. If boosters are needed six months after being “fully
vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate
them?</blockquote></blockquote><p>Judge Doughty's question is spot-on and apparently had not been answered to his satisfaction. Indeed, how could it have been? This is one of the worst conundrums of arbitrariness that the President faces. The drug companies and the federal agencies admit that the injections lose protections after six months, but the mandates grants employment privileges to those who took them a year ago, while banishing those who decline. Makes no sense.</p><p>The Administration's only way out of this Bermuda Triangle of logic is to require booster shots, which would have happened had that FDA advisory panel not rejected the <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-panel-rejects-pfizer-booster-16-older/">booster application in September.</a> Until boosters are mandated, the mandate makes absolutely no sense as anything but a political loyalty test.</p><p><br /></p><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END-->David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-79192723006924875902021-11-30T19:30:00.005-08:002021-12-07T22:42:44.205-08:00Federal Vaccine Mandates Found Not Immune to Challenges- Roundup <div>Lots of good stuff has been happening on in the courts in the last couple of weeks.</div><div><br /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;">5th Circuit's order in <a href="https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf">BTS Holding v. OSHA on 11-12</a>, enjoining the OSHA mandate.</blockquote><div><br /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-allen-winsor-pfizer-eua-comirnaty-vaccines-interchangeable/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=4524bd5c-fc02-448e-8a97-d44d33835b7b">Judge Winsor's order</a> on 11-12, rejecting the claim rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine.</div></blockquote><div><br /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/11/us-district-judge-merryday-quite.html">Judge Merryday's order</a> on 11-22, requiring the military branches to provide information about exception grants on a schedule to prove the exception grant process is not "a ruse."</div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;">Biden Administration's <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/11/staying-true-to-its-arbitrary-roots.html">kicking of the can</a> on the federal employee mandate out until January.</div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/press-releases/cms-injunction.pdf?sfvrsn=ed822d9d_2">Judge Schelp's order</a> on 11-29, enjoining the federal healthcare worker mandate in 10 states. </div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MTAG/2021/11/30/file_attachments/2008888/Nationwide%20Injunction%20-%20CMS%20mandate.pdf">Judge Doughty's order </a>on 11-30, enjoining the federal healthcare worker mandate in all other states.</div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21120202-order-in-kentucky-v-biden">Judge Tatenhove's order</a> on 11-30, enjoining the federal contractor mandate in 3 states.</div></div></blockquote><div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div><br />Hopefully one of the challenges to the federal employee mandate turns the corner soon. I am aware of 12. </div></div><div><br /></div><div><div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;"><ol><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535993693/Complaint-Mark-Brnovich-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Brnovich v. Biden,</a> filed by Attorney General of Arizona, on 9-14, No. 21-1568 (D. Ariz.) ("Defendants’ imposition of vaccine mandates on U.S. citizens and lawfully employed aliens, but not on unauthorized aliens at the border or already present in the United States, constitutes discrimination on the basis of national origin and alienage in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.") See his 10-22 <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535996644/Brnovich-34-Main-TRO" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">motion for TRO </a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540080529/Brnovich-v-Biden-Order-on-Preliminary-Show-temp" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order </a>granting leave to file amended complaint and new motion for preliminary injunction 11-10; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542225068/BRNOVICH-v-Biden-Amended-Complaint-Doc-70-Arizona-AG-Amended-Complaint-11-19" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Amended Complaint</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542224656/BRNOVICH-v-Biden-Doc-72-Motion-for-Prelim-Injunction-AG-of-AZ" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Motion for Preliminary Injunction 11-19</a>; </span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/534909847/Costin-et-al-v-Biden-Complaint-Mandate" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">GREGG COSTIN, et al. v. Biden</a> filed by Michael Yoder on 9-23 (D.C.), 1:21-cv-02484</span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/10/why-i-am-suing-federal-government-my.html" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Foley v. Biden</a>, filed by David Foley and Daniel Flickinger on 9-29 (Northern District of Texas) 4:21-cv-01098-O, See <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/533829008/Document-16-Biden-Response" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant's Response</a>, the <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/533829283/Judge-s-Order-Denying-Preliminary-Injunction-and-Ordering-Plaintiff-Response" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Judge's Order</a>, and Plaintiff's <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/533829594/Plaintiff-s-Response-to-Judge-s-Order-Document-20" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Response</a> to that Order, and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536001425/Document-21-Biden-Response-to-Motion-177114667355" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion</a>; Plaintiff's <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/539241088/plaintiff-s-2nd-motion-to-amend-Foley-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">second motion to amend</a> and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/539241360/22-1-Plaintiff-s-draft-amended-complaint-Foley-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">draft amended complaint</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542225557/Doc-23-D-Motion-for-Extension-of-Time-Re-Answer-Complaint-Foley-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant's request for extension of time to file answer to original complaint in light of potential amendment 11-22</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542226094/Doc-24-Plaintiffs-Opposition-to-Defendants-Request-for-an-Extension-Foley-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's request for extension 11-23</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542226390/Doc-25-Biden-Reply-Re-Extension-of-time-Foley-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant's Reply re extension of time 11-24</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/543604177/Doc-26-Order-Granting-Extension-to-answer-complaint-pending-motion-on-amendment-Foley-v-Biden" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order granting motion for extension in part 11-29</a></span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://lc.org/newsroom/details/101521-military-federal-employees-and-civilian-contractors-sue-biden-1" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Navy Seal, et al v. Biden</a> filed by <a href="https://lc.org/" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Liberty Counsel</a> on 10-15 (Middle District of Florida) 8:21-cv-02429; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542231529/Navy-Seal-1-v-Biden-Order-821-Cv-02429-SDM-TGW-11-22" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order denying prelim injunction, deferring judgment in part (military only), and ordering information about exemption requests provided on schedule </a>(military only); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/545458706/Navy-Seal-1-v-Biden-Middle-FL-Defendant-Oppo-to-Motio-for-Class-12-3-21-with-attachments">Defendant opposition to class certification and exhibits 12-3</a></span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/535109775/5-main-1-pdf" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">ALTSCHULD ET AL v. RAIMONDO et al </a> (D.C.) filed by the Federal Practice Group on 10-19, 1:2021cv02779, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540075815/ALTSCHULD-Defendant-Memorandum-in-Support-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant Response to motion for preliminary injunction</a> ;<a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540076509/Altschuld-Exhibits-14-1-in-support-memorandum" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">exhibits</a>11-3; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540074052/ALTSCHULD-v-RAIMONDO-Order-Denying-Prelim-Injunction-Show-temp-23" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order denying preliminary injunction</a> 11-8</span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;">Rydie et al v. Biden et al <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536000530/Employee-A-v-Biden-Complaint-Document-1" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;"><strike>Employee A v. Biden</strike></a>, filed by Jonathan Bolls on October 19, 2021 (Maryland) 8:2021cv02696, see <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/536001051/Employee-a-Document-7-Motion-for-TRO" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">motion for TRO</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542480561/Defendants-Opposition-to-Plaintiffs-Motion-Rydie-v-Biden-821-Cv-02696" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Biden response in opposition 11-12</a>; Plaintiff Reply; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542480979/Plaintiffs-Reply-to-Defendants-Opposition-to-Plaintiffs-Motion-Rydie-v-Biden-821-Cv-02696" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order Denying TRO 11-19</a></span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.yoderesq.com/bidenvaxlawsuit" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Church v. Biden</a>, filed filed by Michael Yoder on 10-24 (D.C.)1:21-cv-02815, as reported by <a href="https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/27/new-lawsuit-biden-task-force-schemes-to-deny-religious-exemptions-falsifies-medical-records/" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Under Cover DC</a>; Plaintiffs’ application for a <a href="https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/29/church-v-biden-lawsuit-update-the-week-ends-with-hope/" rel="noopener" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #2b63ff; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">temporary restraining order</a>;<span style="color: #222222;"> </span> <a href="https://uncoverdc.com/2021/11/03/church-v-biden-govt-says-no-ripe-claim-over-religious-exemptions/" rel="noopener" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #2b63ff; outline: 0px; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">opposition from the Defendants</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/537254508/Church-v-Biden-Civil-Action-No-1-21-cv-2815-CKK" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Plaintiff's Response 11-3</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540078464/Church-v-Biden-Memorandum-Order-denying-preliminary-injunction" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Memorandum Order denying preliminary injunction 11-8</a></span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542485862/Smith-v-Biden-21-Cv-19457-Complaint-and-Attachments-10-29-21" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Smith v Biden, 1:21-cv-19457-CPO-SAK</a> filed 10-29 (NJ); <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542492885/Brief-in-Support-Motion-for-Injunction-and-Exhibits-Smith-v-Biden-121-Cv-19457-CPO-SAK-Document-4-Filed-11-03-21" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">brief in support motion for injunction with exhibits</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542493373/Opposition-Motion-for-Injunction-Smith-v-Biden-121-Cv-19457-CPO-SAK-Filed-11-05-21" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">opposition to motion for injunction 11-5</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542494684/Reply-to-Opposition-Motion-for-Injunction-Smith-v-Biden-121-Cv-19457-CPO-SAK-Filed-11-06-21" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Reply to motion in opposition 11-6</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542491098/Smith-v-Biden-21-Cv-19457-Opinion-Doc-19-11-8-21" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order denying injunction 11-8</a>; </li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540552615/Amended-Complaint-Afge-Local-501-Show-temp" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">AFGE Local 501 et al v. Biden</a> et al filed by Mark Berkowitz on behalf of AFGE Local 501 and Council of Prison Locals CPL 33 on 10-30 (Southern Florida)</span> 1:21-cv-23828-JAL<span style="font-family: times;">, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540553381/Motion-Prelim-Injunction-Afge-Local-501" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Motion for Preliminary Injunction</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/540553722/Doc-20-CM-ECF-order-denying-motion-preliminary-injunction" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Order denying preliminary injunction</a> (11-15) </span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"> <span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #020202; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-size-adjust: 100%; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ECF-No.-1-Rodden-v.-Faucie-Complaint.pdf" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">James Joseph Rodden, et al. v. Dr. Anthony Fauci, et al</a>. filed by John J. Vecchione, Jenin Younes, and Harriet Hageman of <a href="https://nclalegal.org/2021/11/ncla-tppf-file-class-action-suit-for-naturally-immune-fed-employees-against-covid-vaccine-mandate/" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">New Civil Liberties Alliance</a> and Robert Henneke of Texas Public Policy Foundation on November 5, 2021 (Southern District of Texas) 3:21-cv-00317; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542474758/Rodden-Defendant-Response-in-Oppo-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-23-Main" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Defendant's response in opposition to motion for preliminary injunction</a>, <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542475359/Defendant-Exhibits-to-Response-in-Oppo-to-motion-for-prelim-injunction-Rodden-v-Biden-23-1-8" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">exhibits</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542477983/Rodden-Reply-27-Main-and-Exhibit" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Plaintiff's reply and exhibit</a>; <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/544508528/Rodden-v-Fauci-Order-Denying-Preliminary-Injunction-11-27-21">Order denying injunction 11-27-21</a></span></span></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #020202; font-family: times;"><a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/01-main_Redacted.pdf" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Payne v. Biden</a>, filed by Reed Rubinstein for America First Legal Foundation on November 22, 2021 (D.C.) </span> 1:21-cv-03077; <a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/4-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Plaintiff's motion for Summary Judgment (Nov 24)</a>; <a href="https://wordpress.aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/4-3-Memorandum-in-Support-of-MSJ-3.pdf" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">Memo in support of motion for summary judgment</a></li><li style="margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px;"> <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542164619/Complaint-Prison-Locals-33-and-2018-v-Vaccine-Mandate" style="color: #ac991f; text-decoration-line: none;">AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COUNCIL OF PRISON LOCALS 33 and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL 2018 v. DIRECTOR KIRAN AHUJA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and LLOYD AUSTIN</a>, filed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr. Michael T. van der Veen on behalf of Council 33 and Local 2018 on November 23, 2021 (E.D. Pa) 2:2021cv05172</li></ol></div><div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;"><br /></div><div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px;">I keep the list updated here: <a href="https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/10/list-of-law-suits-filed-by-federal.html">https://laborrelated.blogspot.com/2021/10/list-of-law-suits-filed-by-federal.html</a></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-65622281027162715582021-11-29T19:41:00.009-08:002021-11-30T12:36:51.060-08:00Staying true to its Arbitrary Roots, Federal Employee Mandate takes December Off, mostlyAs <a href="https://www.federaltimes.com/management/2021/11/29/white-house-delays-federal-employee-vaccine-enforcement-until-new-year/">reported by the Federal Times</a>, the White House is said to have delayed enforcement of the mandate until "after the holiday season" for most federal employees.<br /><br />The move was announced by the partial release of an email sent from OPM/OMB/SFWTF leaders to agency heads. In the email,<br /><br /><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;">“Given that tremendous progress, we encourage your agencies to continue with robust education and counseling efforts through this holiday season as the first step in an enforcement process, with no subsequent enforcement actions, beyond that education and counseling and, if warranted, a letter of reprimand, for most employees who have not yet complied with the vaccination requirement until the new calendar year begins in January,” Ahuja and Miller wrote.</blockquote><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-m56PoC1s9NM/YaWa6i_M2RI/AAAAAAAAAUU/Js15JsjN3moXd16PWhTQnJBSinZqKXK1gCLcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="278" data-original-width="799" height="212" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-m56PoC1s9NM/YaWa6i_M2RI/AAAAAAAAAUU/Js15JsjN3moXd16PWhTQnJBSinZqKXK1gCLcBGAsYHQ/w611-h212/image.png" width="611" /></a></div><br /><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;">“We understand that your agencies <b>may need to act on enforcement sooner for a limited number of employees</b>, such as where there are additional or compounding performance or workplace safety issues under consideration, but in general, consistency across government in further enforcement of the vaccine requirement after the start of the new calendar year is desired,” they added.</blockquote><br /> <div>Who is that? Sounds like they are talking about probationary employees but don't want to say it. Possibly employees whose PIPs are running out. But would they really want to complicate a performance discharge with the mandate? Possibly. Or possibly they just don't want to admit that they have made a wholescale change to the mandate.</div><div><br /></div><div>Whatever their intentions, by moving the deadline to January, the Administration has made the mandate even more arbitrary, if that is possible. Perhaps it is like multiplying against zero over and over again and it doesn't get "more arbitrary." I am not sure.</div><div><br /></div><div>In any event, by January 2022, those employees who first became "fully vaccinated" in January 2021 will no longer have any claim to an immunity advantage over the rest of us. Pfizer and the FDA admitted that, whatever it does, the stuff wears off in six months. After a year, there is nothing left. We know this from Israel. We know this from Ireland. We know this from Gibraltar which has had serious outbreaks after achieving 100% "vaccination." </div><div><br /></div><div>So, the real question is when is the definition of "fully vaccinated" going to change to having your third, fourth, and fifth shots. That is where this is headed. My guess is that change will occur in January. Before they have even resolved the administration, let alone the litigation, of the first round of the mandate, they will be coaxing the good sheep to stay good and get their boosters. </div><div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-MSr8woO4bOA/YaWdEKr0D1I/AAAAAAAAAUc/0j2U7yVdxHcyiy9KU0C2IkDMvcDlLGvPwCLcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="834" data-original-width="1600" height="221" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-MSr8woO4bOA/YaWdEKr0D1I/AAAAAAAAAUc/0j2U7yVdxHcyiy9KU0C2IkDMvcDlLGvPwCLcBGAsYHQ/w424-h221/image.png" width="424" /></a></div><br /><br /></div><div>If you have taken your shots already, you need to ask yourself when you decided to continue taking tri-monthly mRNA treatments for the rest of your life. It is not too late to get off this train. Before you take your next injection, do yourself a favor and read RFK Jr.'s book <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/fauci_info/">The Real Dr. Fauci </a>and also seek out sources that attempt to debunk it. After all, your next shot could be your last. </div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-85316305944868859922021-11-28T18:44:00.006-08:002021-11-28T18:50:08.674-08:00Omicron and the Spinning of FearIt's like they aren't even trying anymore. Emergency declarations are made by states. Dire warnings given. But if you take the time to actually read about the big, bad Omicron...it is described as "mild."<div><br /></div><div>From <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/safrican-doctor-says-patients-with-omicron-variant-have-very-mild-symptoms-2021-11-28/">Reuters</a>:</div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><br /><i>Coetzee, who is also on the Ministerial Advisory Committee on Vaccines, said unlike the Delta so far patients have not reported loss of smell or taste and there has been no major drop in oxygen levels with the new variant.</i></blockquote><i><br /></i><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><i>Her experience so far has been that the variant is affecting people who are 40 or younger. Almost half of the patients with Omicron symptoms that she treated were not vaccinated.</i></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"><i> The most predominant clinical complaint is severe fatigue for one or two days. With them, the headache and the body aches and pain.</i></p></blockquote><p>That sounds exactly like what I had on 11/5. I had fatigue, low fever on the first night, and a bad headache for a couple of days. My back muscles felt like I had overdone it on a rock climbing wall or rowboat or something. Two days and two Motrin later, I was fine (I did confirm my positive Covid results through both over-the-counter and through-the-counter methods).</p><p>So, we should all be super scared because it is so mild or something.</p><p>Also, it is incredible how the spin factory never stops spinning.</p><p>Why would you possibly phrase a sentence this way?</p><p></p><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"><i>Almost half of the patients with Omicron symptoms that she treated were not vaccinated.</i></p></blockquote><p>They use syntax to try to confuse the issue at every turn. The better way to phrase that would be as follows:</p><p></p><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p></p><p style="text-align: left;"><i><u>More than half of the patients with Omicron symptoms that she has treated had been vaccinated.</u></i></p><p></p></blockquote><p>But wait a minute, vaccines are supposed to make you not get the virus. But this admission contradicts that and it should be concerning to vaxx hoax believers. It should be even more concerning if you consider that<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations?country=ZAF"> <u>less than 30% of South Africans are "vaccinated</u>.</a>" </p><p>So, more than half of Omicron patients come from the minority of the South African population that has been injected....and the symptoms for both groups are mild. Therefore, everyone panic and get injected with everything available. If you have had two shots, get a third. If you have had all three of Pfizer, get a J&J as well. Get the Moderna too. Get them all again and again until you die. Only way to beat this <strike>mild </strike>threat is to be <b>fully vaccinated</b>.</p><p><br /></p>
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="giphy-embed" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://giphy.com/embed/3o7TKy3KWDYOA7OUSI" width="480"></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/idiocracy-mike-jude-3o7TKy3KWDYOA7OUSI">via GIPHY</a></p>
David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-65974994202558899202021-11-26T19:15:00.014-08:002021-11-28T20:13:07.624-08:00Federal Agency Vaccination RatesYou know that we are dealing with a smoke and mirrors operation when they play little tricks at every turn. On Wednesday (Nov. 24), the Administration selectively published vaccination rates for certain federal agencies or departments. The numbers were posted amidst a very "rah, rah, this is going great" narrative. It is kind like if Andrew Jackson advocates had spun it as "Great news, 90% of federal officials are on board with pledging their loyalty to the new president," instead of shrugging at the purge of the 10% with the motto, "to the victor go the spoils."<br /><div><br /></div><div>Since the numbers release was a P.R. post (not an act of transparency to inform the public) they didn't mention the lowest vaccinated agencies or positions. For instance, I'd like to know the "vaccination" rate for federal prison guards. I assume they would have a particularly low rate because two prison guards locals are the only federal unions to have broken rank with the <strike>jab-scabs</strike> injection-pushing AFGE national. The thing about prison guards is that they have been doing their jobs since the pandemic began. They have witnessed Covid outbreaks and mass "vaccinations" on controlled populations. Go ahead and try to tell those guys the side effects aren't so bad.<div><br /></div><div>But selective publication and lack of transparency is only part of the smoke and mirrors. The funnier part is that rather than just tell the public what they interested in--"vaccination" rates--they instead introduce the new concept of "compliance" which includes both those who have been injected with these toxin-creating products and those who have requested exceptions from them. The only employees not listed in the "compliance" column are those stoic souls who have simply refused to take this poison and not even requested an excuse. By this trick, the Administration groups most of those who are fighting its edict (those seeking exceptions) with those who have actually complied, conflates them as the same, and claims it is a success. This is like some weak sales trick to get you to look at a different number than the one you are interested in. "The car starts 92% of the time. 5% of the time it doesn't start for reasons that we know. Only 3% of the time does it fail to start for unknown reasons...So, the starts for this car are 97% understood, great car." Hey, press, here is your headline, "<i>99% are compliant!" </i>Even the complaint press wasn't going to make <i>that</i> the headline, although they did go over the compliance rates in their coverage, and thus assisted the Administration in distracting from the issues.</div><div><i>*Edit, here is an outlet called the Federal New Network that really jumped the shark with this for the Administration: Headline </i><i><a href="https://federalnewsnetwork.com/workforce/2021/11/federal-agencies-close-to-100-compliance-with-vaccine-mandate-as-enforcement-begins/ ">Federal agencies close to 100% compliance with vaccine mandate as enforcement begins</a>; and here is the Daily Caller taking the bait or carrying the water: </i><a href=" https://dailycaller.com/2021/11/24/federal-government-compliance-rate-joe-biden-vaccine-mandate-omb/"><i>Federal Government Has 96.5% Compliance Rate With Biden’s Vaccine Mandate, According To Administration</i></a><i> (pathetic propaganda)*</i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div>In any regard, here are the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2021/11/24/update-on-implementation-of-covid-19-vaccination-requirement-for-federal-employees/">"vaccination rates" released</a> on Wednesday (I have reordered the columns so that "vaccination" appears before "compliance" and sorted them by "vaccination" rate) .</div><div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GG6pFKAF62s/YaGhB-jn3jI/AAAAAAAAAT8/2jSxYVmYCI4CWq4WQGBMhqpJxulP_3tdACLcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="617" data-original-width="413" height="682" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GG6pFKAF62s/YaGhB-jn3jI/AAAAAAAAAT8/2jSxYVmYCI4CWq4WQGBMhqpJxulP_3tdACLcBGAsYHQ/w457-h682/image.png" width="457" /></a></div><br /><div style="text-align: left;">No surprise that the elephant in the room went unaddressed: how many have been given exceptions?</div></div><br /><div style="text-align: left;">One surprise for me is the EPA which has 8% of employees unvaccinated and 5% out of compliance (i.e. the stoics who are not asking for an exceptions). After reflection, I should not have been surprised though. EPA scientists understand important things like statistics, toxins, and regulatory capture, and they are experts at sifting through scientific lies and obfuscations (Robert F. Kennedy Jr's excellent book <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-the-real-anthony-fauci-amazon-bestseller//">The Real Anthony Fauci</a> gets into the similarities in fields). </div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">On another note, I imagine that the 10% of NASA employees who are rejecting the injections have pretty firm grips on statistics and the scientific method and aren't going to be easily persuaded by the low level propaganda we see coming out of the CDC and news outlets.</div><div style="text-align: left;"> </div><div style="text-align: left;">I would really like to know the percentage of FDA employees who are not taking the Kool-Aid. Unfortunately, they are lumped in with HHS and unknown to we of the outer circles and FOIA is a very slow process.</div></div><br /><br /></div><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-65475817035147389662021-11-25T20:09:00.007-08:002021-11-25T20:31:45.614-08:00The Dog that Doesn't Bark and the Defense that is not made - Exception Process is RuseAs discussed in my last post, the military's record for approving religious exception requests is somewhat of a running joke. You can count the number of exceptions they have granted with a donut.<div><br /></div><div>Per Judge Merryman: <!--AddThis Button BEGIN--><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"></a>
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a>
</div>
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--><div><br /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;"> "</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;">Whether characterized as a facial challenge or as a class of precisely similar as applied challenges, requiring only a single judicial determination, </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;">t</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;">he plaintiffs’ contention is — based on current data — quite plausible that <b>each branch’s procedure for requesting a religious exemption is a ruse</b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;"> that will result inevitably in the undifferentiated (and therefore unlawful under RFRA) denial of each service member’s request. Particularly, the data produced by the defendants show that more than 16,643 requests for a religious exemption pend. </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;">The military has granted no exemptions but has denied hundreds.</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;"> This disparity, although susceptible to a benign explanation is, as well, susceptible to an explanation actionable and remediable under RFRA</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;">."</span></div></blockquote><div><span style="background-color: white; font-family: trebuchet; font-size: 13.2px;"><br /></span></div><div>Which got me to thinking about federal employees. About 10% of the federal workforce or 175,000 employees are said to have pending exception requests. How many have been approved? I know of none. I have read most of the filings in the 12 cases that have been filed against the Government since the EO was issued. One thing that I have noticed is that the Government frequently argues that claims are not ripe because exceptions for plaintiffs might yet be granted, but it never points to the grants that it has made. There was a mention of one in <i>Church v. Biden</i>, but when you look at the complaint a little bit, it looks like the purported grant there is disputed. If there was a grant, the Government is apparently trying to take it back. See discussion of Special Agent Hallfrisch at <a href="https://www.yoderesq.com/bidenvaxlawsuit">page 14 of the complain</a>t. I don't know quite what to make of the Special Agent Hallfrisch situation, but if the Government is "trying to take it back," I will not count it as an accommodation.</div></div><div><br /></div><div> In response to my own motion for preliminary injunction, On October 5, 2021, the Government noted that the NLRB had already received requests from other NLRB employees on September 25, 2021 and September 28,
2021. I replied that it would be more assuring if the Government could have written that those requests had been <i>granted.</i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div>Here we are two months after the first NLRB employee put in his or her request. How long does it take for a group of federal managers to evaluate the sincerity of one's beliefs? </div><div><br /></div><div>Given that the Government never points to all of those employees to whom it has granted exceptions, I think we can see in this absence the "dog that doesn't bark" and deduce that, like the military, the civilian agencies have not given any exceptions.</div><div><br /></div><div>"Watson, what would a ruse look like?"</div><div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GrZ-6k9yV7M/YaBdwPj_E_I/AAAAAAAAATc/kVu94k_WKUcxdRckIaRpytDNng1BWGrUwCLcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="256" data-original-width="197" height="549" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GrZ-6k9yV7M/YaBdwPj_E_I/AAAAAAAAATc/kVu94k_WKUcxdRckIaRpytDNng1BWGrUwCLcBGAsYHQ/w423-h549/image.png" width="423" /></a></div><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-87811663833066629202021-11-24T20:34:00.003-08:002021-11-24T20:35:15.554-08:00US District Judge Merryday: "quite plausible that each branch’s procedure for requesting a religious exemption is a ruse that will result inevitably in...denial of each service member’s request"<div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">Did you think you would live to see the day when a federal judge would think that it is quite possible that the military branches are engaging in ruse procedures to end-run the religious rights of servicemen? We are now at that point. And, unfortunately, the judge is not wrong.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">In Judge Merryday's November 22 <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/542231529/Navy-Seal-1-v-Biden-Order-821-Cv-02429-SDM-TGW-11-22">Order </a> in <a href="https://lc.org/newsroom/details/101521-military-federal-employees-and-civilian-contractors-sue-biden-1">Navy Seal, et al v. Biden</a> (8:21-cv-02429) a <a href="https://lc.org">Liberty Counsel</a> case (Middle District of<span> </span>Florida), we see evidence that the "exception process" at the federal government is just as fake as the "vaccines" from which citizens are seeking exception. Like the "vaccines", exception requests at best provide some protection for a short period of time. They also come with side effects (like unfavorable assignments) and don't ultimately stop you from getting fired. </span><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span><div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">Judge Merryday:</span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></div></div></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><span><span> "</span></span>Whether characterized as a facial challenge or as a class of precisely similar as applied challenges, requiring only a single judicial determination, <u>t</u><u>he plaintiffs’ contention is — based on current data — quite plausible that each branch’s procedure
for requesting a religious exemption is a ruse</u> that will result inevitably in the undifferentiated (and therefore unlawful under RFRA) denial of each service member’s request. Particularly, the data produced by the defendants show that more than 16,643
requests for a religious exemption pend. <b>The military has granted no exemptions but
has denied hundreds.</b> This disparity, although susceptible to a benign explanation is,
as well, susceptible to an explanation actionable and remediable under RFRA<span>."</span></span></div></div></div></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">(emphasis supplied) </span></p><div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">Although I view them grimly, these numbers come as no surprise. As I <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/539241360/22-1-Plaintiff-s-draft-amended-complaint-Foley-v-Biden">wrote</a> in response to an agency solicitation for religious exception requests:</span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></div></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><u><i>Wicked and Cruel Exercise</i></u> </span></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"> It is my (nonreligious belief) that this whole inquiry is essentially a
demeaning and cruel exercise where no matter how much groveling they do, very few
employees will be granted an exception and roughly zero employees will be accommodated
in a manner that involves them retaining their jobs. </span></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">If you have any concrete guidance as to the idea of an accommodation being
something that is possible for employees, please provide me with that assurance. If there
is not really any chance of accommodation, please stop this demeaning inquiry. </span></p></blockquote><div><div><div><div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><span style="color: #2b2b2b;">Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver</span> <a href="https://lc.org/newsroom/details/112221-military-under-a-microscope-and-federal-employees-entitled-to-religious-exemption-1">discussed Judge Merryday's order as follows</a>:</span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></div></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #2b2b2b;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"> “Although the court withheld an injunction today, the military will now be under a microscope to report the status and disposition of all religious exemption requests. The military has not granted any of the 16,643 requests. The military now has a clear choice—voluntarily accommodate those with sincere religious beliefs or be ordered by the court to accommodate sincere religious beliefs. Federal employers and civilian contractor employers must hear the message from this court loud and clear—the federal executive orders expressly require religious exemption.”</span></span></blockquote><div></div></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">From my point of view, federal mandate challengers should take heart that at least one federal court is raising its eyebrows about the lack of exemption approvals. As the days go on and the number of exemptions remains at about zero, more courts will be doubtlessly raise their eyebrows as well.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">Pray for the members of our armed forces.</span></div></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></i></div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;"><br /></span></i></div></blockquote></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">St. Michael the Archangel, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">defend us in battle. </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">Be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the Devil. </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">and do thou, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">O Prince of the heavenly hosts, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">by the power of God, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">thrust into hell Satan, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">and all the evil spirits, </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">who prowl about the world </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div><div><i><span style="font-family: trebuchet;">seeking the ruin of souls. Amen. </span></i></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><div><div><div><div><div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-nCXmSAZwD08/YZ8R-FA7yoI/AAAAAAAAATU/d1JBBy4Y_0UZJlipYmKeLMu4KwW8fUKNgCLcBGAsYHQ/image.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="798" data-original-width="648" height="532" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-nCXmSAZwD08/YZ8R-FA7yoI/AAAAAAAAATU/d1JBBy4Y_0UZJlipYmKeLMu4KwW8fUKNgCLcBGAsYHQ/w432-h532/image.png" width="432" /></a></div><br /><br /></span></div></div></div></div></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-88398690027361781872021-11-21T21:03:00.002-08:002021-11-22T06:07:45.746-08:00Feds for Medical Freedom<div>So far, only one federal employee union (Local 501, an AFGE local that represents prison guards in the Miami area) has taken legal action against President Biden's unconstitutional federal employee vaccine mandate. There are 986 other AFGE locals who are standing on the sidelines with their hands in their pockets. </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, at the national level, AFGE has been complicit, complacent, and accommodating to the President's demand that federal employees submit to experimental treatments.</div><div><br /></div><div> The best that national level AFGE has done is to ask President Biden to make the federal employee deadline consistent with the federal contractor deadline, which has been moved back to January 18.</div><div><br /></div><div>AFGE and other unions will tell their members that the President's powers are airtight and that there are no viable legal challenges. Do you really think they would say the same thing if President Trump had done something similar? Including Local 501's case, there are nine cases challenging the mandate in federal court. AFGE and its locals aren't failing to take action because they lack any grounds to challenge the mandate. They aren't challenging the mandate because they don't want to challenge the mandate.</div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, a growing number of federal employees are banding together to do that which the unions should be doing.</div><div><br /></div><div>This is a video about their group: </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://www.facebook.com/Feds4MedFreedom/videos/911401359491987/">https://www.facebook.com/Feds4MedFreedom/videos/911401359491987/</a></div><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
</div>
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/Feds4MedFreedom/videos/911401359491987/"><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4eb3431c2c237adc" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!--AddThis Button END--></a><div><br /></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3342355352305700145.post-73442198625461095002021-11-21T11:40:00.003-08:002021-11-21T18:09:18.643-08:00All-Cause Mortality and Occam's razor11,000 people were given a placebo and 11,000 were given Pfizer's elixir of life. Six months later, 38 participants had died. This total includes all causes of death, regardless of whether it is traceable to the injections or the virus. Which group fared better? <a href="https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/317091">17 placebo participants died, compared to 21</a> who had received the elixir; a difference of 23.5%. <div><br /><div><div>That was in March of 2021. How have these groups done since? We will never know that because the placebo participants were later informed that they had not gotten the elixir of life and were encouraged to take the "vaccine." Even placebo group <strike>guinea pigs</strike> children who participate in these studies are later informed that they were in the placebo group and <a href="https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/polis-calls-children-who-participated-in-covid-19-vaccine-trial-heroes">encouraged to become "fully vaccinated."</a> Given that the virus poses a virtually non-existent threat to children, this move can at best be seen as squandering a very good source of information about long-term risks. At worse, it could be viewed as a deliberate effort to prevent investigation. </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, all-cause mortality is up significantly in Scotland as a whole. See <a href="https://scottishunity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/MortReport_2021-45.pdf">https://scottishunity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/MortReport_2021-45.pdf </a> Incidentally, <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations?country=GBR">80% of the Scottish population </a>has received at least one dose. </div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pUU_xCobsDI/YZqdGme8HkI/AAAAAAAAASs/m_ectBJ-bMUWl9OJkw9kZYv_qHkC8sloACLcBGAsYHQ/s827/death%2Bscotland.PNG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="541" data-original-width="827" height="292" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pUU_xCobsDI/YZqdGme8HkI/AAAAAAAAASs/m_ectBJ-bMUWl9OJkw9kZYv_qHkC8sloACLcBGAsYHQ/w448-h292/death%2Bscotland.PNG" width="448" /></a></div><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">Hospitals in America are seeing record numbers of emergency room patients. These patients are really sick and they don't have Covid. See <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">https://khn.org/news/article/hospital-emergency-rooms-swamped-seriously-ill-non-covid-patients/</a>:<br /><br /></div></div></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div><div><div style="text-align: left;">"But now, they’re too full. Even in parts of the country where covid isn’t overwhelming the health system, patients are showing up to the ER sicker than before the pandemic, their diseases more advanced and in need of more complicated care."</div></div></div></blockquote><div><div><div style="text-align: left;"><br />Leading theories are that people waited until covid had died down to have heart attacks and get cancer.</div></div></div><p>On the other hand, if the results of the Pfizer were extrapolated, we would expect to see about a 24% increase in excess deaths among those who took the injections.</p><div><div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div></div></div>David Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04450282588034951412noreply@blogger.com0