Is anyone keeping track?

Earlier tonight, I sent a request to my county's medical examiner for the vaccination dates (if any) for certain people whose causes of death are be publicly available. I cross-referenced them in VAERS to confirm they had not been reported there. I have no information as to the "vaccination" history of any of these people and could not glean anything from the internet other than that they died way too young.

Given that several new, experimental medical products have recently been injected by more than half of the public, I would expect the medical examiner to have this information at his fingertips. 

If he does not have that information, that can only be because he is not looking for it when he assesses the cause of death. If he is not looking for it, is anyone?

I would like nothing more than to find out that most of these people were not "vaccinated" and that if they were "vaccinated" they had not received any injections near the times of their deaths. Even though it is a small sample size/universe, I would find that somewhat comforting. On the other hand, I would be more concerned than I am now if I saw that all of them had been "vaccinated" within two weeks of their deaths.

I will update this page with any information that I receive.

Historic Defiance of an Order and Discharge of Members of the Armed Forces

Earlier this week, we learned that the Air Force had terminated 27 airmen for defying the order to take experimental injections. 

Whatever you think of the "vaccines", you should at least respect these airmen for following through on their moral convictions.  I find it as pathetic as it is predictable that the relatively few press outlets who covered this story failed to acknowledge the moral courage of these men, but rather sought to diminish their importance by quoting only Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said "all of them were in their first term of enlistment, so they were younger, lower-ranking personnel." In other words, their life's dream was to serve in the Air Force and they had to give it up for the convictions not long after they joined. .  

The Hammer and Syringe Emblem

Even worse is the transparently dishonest characterization of this purge as normal by comparing these heroes to common order violators.

It is not unusual for members of the military to be thrown out of the service for disobeying an order; discipline is a key tenet of the armed services. As a comparison, Stefanek said that in the first three quarters of 2021, about 1,800 airmen were discharged for failure to follow orders.

Of those 1,800, how many involved a group of airmen being discharged for refusing to follow an order out of moral conviction? Comparing these courageous airmen to those who are discharged for common order violations strikes me as spiteful and inappropriate.

In 1968, 43 soldiers from Fort Hood refused to be deployed to repress peace demonstrations at home. 

I am no military history buff and I don't know if there have been other similar events.  I think it is pretty safe to guess however, that we will soon be eclipsing the 43 order-refusers of 1968 in a mass defiance of orders event that will eventually lead to the largest discharge of soldiers in modern times.

Federal Vaccine Mandates: Three Iced, Two In Effect. Don't forget to pray for members of the Military and Federal Employees

There has been a lot of great news about the blocking of three federal mandates (OSHA, CMS, and federal contractors). But, the orders requiring servicemembers and federal employees have not yet been blocked.

 Please pray for the members of the military and the federal civilian employees,  and especially for the spiritual and physical health of those who took the injections because of the mandates.

Whose "Community Standards"?

A group of federal employees who reject the mandated injections recently had their thriving Facebook group disabled.  According to Mr. Zuckerberg's Company, "Feds 4 Medical Freedom goes against our Community Standards on misinformation that could cause physical harm." Facebook claims that it encourages free expression, but doesn't allow false information about COVID-19 that could contribute to physical harm.

So, you are free to talk on Zuckerberg's platform, just so long as what you say isn't false. That is, you are free to talk, as long as what you say agrees with Zuckerberg. You can get away with contradicting Zuckerbergian shibboleths until Zuckerberg's monitors notice that you are getting too many views, likes, reposts, and new members. At that point, you might be a danger to yourself and others.

I would not have such a problem with that if Mr. Zuckerberg were more upfront about it. The terms and conditions should be clear: "You are not allowed to disagree with the orthodoxy and shibboleths of your betters on this platform." Instead, he claims that this is part of "our Community Standards."

I have lived in various states and regions of America. I think that I understand the community standards of most American communities. Based on all of my experience, I don't recognize the Community Standard. It is foreign to me.

American Community Standards involve accepting that a man has the right to open his mouth and be proved an idiot. American Community Standards involve the right to exclaim that the Emperor has no vaccine.

The "Community Standards" of Mr. Zuckerberg's company is simply the standard of an insecure elite that  knows it cannot compete in the free flow of ideas and information. 

Since we are now communicating over the Internet, Americans had better do something to make sure that their Internet communications are governed by American Community Standards.  And we'd better do it fast. In 2017, you were probably not planning how you would find ways to speak freely about your opinions in the event of a health emergency, but at that time, Big Pharma was making plans to partner with Big Tech to muzzle you. 

If you want to understand what is happening, you need to read RFK's book and follow the citations for yourself. The prescience of the scenario from the 2017, The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028, a Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators, is unsettling. 

 

 

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: How might using social media partners to silence and deplatform critics ensure that Americans have access to information that is as free, safe, and effective as the vaccine?

A Good Question Raised by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty noted and asked in his order yesterday in Louisiana v. Becerra the following:

The CMS Mandate does not yet require boosters to the COVID-19 vaccines. However, the CDC recently recommended boosters.  If boosters are needed six months after being “fully vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?

Judge Doughty's question is spot-on and apparently had not been answered to his satisfaction. Indeed, how could it have been? This is one of the worst conundrums of arbitrariness that the President faces. The drug companies and the federal agencies admit that the injections lose protections after six months, but the mandates grants employment privileges to those who took them a year ago, while banishing those who decline. Makes no sense.

The Administration's only way out of this Bermuda Triangle of logic is to require booster shots, which would have happened had that FDA advisory panel not rejected the booster application in September. Until boosters are mandated, the mandate makes absolutely no sense as anything but a political loyalty test.